§Why CasetextPricing

In Re Snap Inc. Securities Litigation

RESPONSE

4 Cited authorities

  1. Perlmutter v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

    Case No.: 10-CV-03451-LHK (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2011)   Cited 29 times
    Explaining different methods used to calculate financial interest

  2. Darwin v. Taylor

    Civil Action No. 12-cv-01038-CMA-CBS (D. Colo. Oct. 23, 2012)   Cited 6 times
    Noting that the movant “present[ed] numerous new trades that appeared nowhere in his moving papers”

  3. Schriver v. Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.

    Case No.: SACV 06-31 CJC (RNBx), Case No.: SACV 06-82 CJC (MLGx), Case No.: SACV 06-45 CJC (RNBx), Case No.: SACV 06-106 CJC (RNBx), Case No.: SACV 06-145 CJC (RNBx), Case No.: SACV 06-91 CJC (RNBx), Case No.: SACV 06-128 CJC (RNBx), Case No.: SACV 06-1177 CJC (RNBx) (C.D. Cal. May. 1, 2006)   Cited 9 times
    Noting that some courts have "expressed reluctance to permit aggregation of individual investors' claimed losses to confer lead plaintiff status absent some showing that the proposed group members have some relationship independent of the litigation or that they will be able to coordinate their efforts" while other courts have refused to allow investor groups to serve as lead plaintiff

  4. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,446 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party