51 Cited authorities

  1. Moss v. U.S. Secret Service

    572 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 8,712 times
    Holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the district court's deferral of the summary judgment motion
  2. In re Tobacco II Cases

    46 Cal.4th 298 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 1,202 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied
  3. Fayer v. Vaughn

    649 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 728 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "accept factual allegations in the complaint as true and construe the pleadings in the light most favorable to the non-moving party"
  4. Concha v. London

    62 F.3d 1493 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that Rule 9(b) does not apply to ERISA fiduciary-duty claims
  5. Stearns v. Ticketmaster Corp.

    655 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 302 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court erred in denying class certification by requiring individualized proof of reliance and causation, and remanding in light of In re Tobacco II Cases
  6. Birdsong v. Apple

    590 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 316 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that hypothetical injury was insufficient for standing
  7. Mirkin v. Wasserman

    5 Cal.4th 1082 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 406 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in a class action, plaintiffs need only plead and prove actual reliance for the named plaintiffs and, if done, actual reliance will be presumed for the rest of the class
  8. Doe v. U.S.

    419 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 280 times
    Holding that the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings was premature and should have been denied because it was filed before the defendant filed an answer
  9. Weinstat v. Dentsply International, Inc.

    180 Cal.App.4th 1213 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 225 times
    Holding that "the concept of reliance has been purposefully abandoned" for express warranty claims under the California UCC
  10. Donovan v. RRL Corp.

    26 Cal.4th 261 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 286 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a licensed automobile dealer's advertisement regarding a particular vehicle at a specific price constituted an offer in light of the California Vehicle Code, which rendered illegal the failure to sell the vehicle at the advertised price to any person while it remained unsold
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 344,948 times   920 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1750 - Title of act

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1750   Cited 2,665 times   67 Legal Analyses

    This title may be cited as the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Ca. Civ. Code § 1750 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1550.

  13. Section 17500 - Untrue or misleading advertising

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500   Cited 2,653 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Requiring action that originated in California to effect consumers in another state
  14. Section 2301 - Definitions

    15 U.S.C. § 2301   Cited 2,514 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Including as consumers those entitled to enforce a warranty "under applicable State law"
  15. Section 1794 - Action by buyer for damages and other legal and equitable relief

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1794   Cited 615 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing damages for breach of an implied warranty "[w]here the buyer has rightfully rejected or justifiably revoked acceptance of the goods"
  16. Section 1793.2 - Service and repair facilities

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1793.2   Cited 475 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Allowing the buyer to "elect restitution in lieu of replacement"
  17. Section 2313 - Express warranties by affirmation, promise, description, sample

    Cal. Com. Code § 2313   Cited 364 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that an express warranty is a "promise made by the seller to the buyer which relates to the goods"
  18. Section 2314 - Implied warranty: merchantability; usage of trade

    Cal. Com. Code § 2314   Cited 319 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Adopting and codifying Uniform Commercial Code § 2-314
  19. Section 1791.1 - Implied warranty of merchantability; implied warranty of fitness

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1791.1   Cited 299 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Extending express warranty remedies to implied warranty