§Why CasetextPricing

Arnold Goldstein et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al

REPLY in Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and Declaration of Matthew J. Matern in Support Thereof 154

6 Cited authorities

  1. TRW Inc. v. Andrews

    534 U.S. 19 (2001)   Cited 1,185 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding a cardinal principal of statutory interpretation is that “no clause, sentence, or word shall be superfluous, void, or insignificant”

  2. Sali v. Corona Reg'l Med. Ctr.

    889 F.3d 623 (9th Cir. 2018)   Cited 158 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court erred by rejecting evidence based solely on inadmissibility

  3. Sun Chem. Corp. v. Fike Corp.

    Civil Action No. 13-4069 (JMV) (MF) (D.N.J. Jul. 20, 2018)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. 13-4069 (JMV) (MF) 07-20-2018 SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FIKE CORPORATION AND SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, Defendants. John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J. Not for Publication OPINION AND ORDER John Michael Vazquez , U.S.D.J. This matter comes before the Court on a motion for sanctions filed by Defendants Fike Corporation ("Fike") and Suppression Systems Incorporated ("SSI") (collectively, "Defendants"). D.E. 217. Defendants seek sanctions against Plaintiff Sun Chemical

  4. Terry v. BP Amoco Chemical Co.

    574 F. App'x 410 (5th Cir. 2014)   Cited 3 times
    Holding that CSB Safety Bulletin is inadmissible and cannot be relied upon to survive summary judgment

  5. Rule 701 - Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 701   Cited 5,710 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Requiring lay opinion testimony to be "rationally based on the witness's perception"

  6. Section 7412 - Hazardous air pollutants

    42 U.S.C. § 7412   Cited 436 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Mandating the EPA "require the maximum degree of reduction" that is "achievable" in regulating hazardous air pollutants