8 Cited authorities

  1. Assoc. of Mexican-Am. v. State of Calif

    231 F.3d 572 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 789 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the same where the indirect employer, the State of California, implemented an allegedly discriminatory skills test that was a prerequisite for the plaintiffs to gain employment with their direct employers, the school districts
  2. Champion Produce, Inc. v. Ruby Robinson Co.

    342 F.3d 1016 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 320 times
    Holding that even though attorney's fees were not properly awardable under Rule 68, costs (excluding fees) were mandatory
  3. Miles v. State of California

    320 F.3d 986 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 166 times
    Holding the district court "did not abuse its discretion in concluding that [plaintiff] did not present evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption that costs should be granted to the prevailing party."
  4. You v. Longs Drug Stores California LLC

    594 F. App'x 438 (9th Cir. 2015)   Cited 8 times

    No. 13-15786 03-02-2015 TAMMY P. YOU, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA LLC, doing business as Long Drugs; THOMAS MCKEOWN; JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS, INCLUDING PARTNERSHIP 1 THROUGH 10, Defendants - Appellees. NOT FOR PUBLICATION DC No. 1:11 cv-0530 SOM MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Susan Oki Mollway, Chief District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 17, 2015 Honolulu

  5. Mulligan v. Yang

    Case No. CV 15-712 DDP (AJWx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2017)   Cited 1 times
    Holding that an award of $6,281.85 was "a reasonable sum that confirms the ordinary nature of the [civil rights] case"
  6. Luong v. City of S.F.

    630 F. App'x 691 (9th Cir. 2015)   Cited 1 times

    No. 13-16305 11-16-2015 KIMBERLY LUONG; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants - Appellees. NOT FOR PUBLICATION D.C. No. 3:11-cv-05661-MEJ MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maria-Elena James, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Submitted October 20, 2015 San Francisco, California Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. This disposition is not appropriate for

  7. Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54   Cited 41,036 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"
  8. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 14,953 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"