§Why CasetextPricing

Blanchard et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee

RESPONSE to Motion re MOTION for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54

9 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,807 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  2. General Acquisition, Inc. v. Gencorp, Inc.

    23 F.3d 1022 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that "[A]lthough Rule 54(b) relaxes the traditional finality requirement for appellate review, it does not tolerate immediate appeal of every action taken by a district court."

  3. Corrosioneering v. Thyssen Environmental Sys

    807 F.2d 1279 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 192 times
    Holding that a district court erred by certifying a ruling on indemnity before there was a determination of liability because the issues were related, collateral and dependent upon each other

  4. Solomon v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

    782 F.2d 58 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 119 times
    Holding bare-bones statement of “no just reason for delay” insufficient to convey jurisdiction

  5. Aiken v. City of Memphis

    37 F.3d 1155 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 79 times
    Holding that statistical evidence comparing promotion rates among all entry-level officers and firefighters was sufficiently reliable to show disparate impact on the basis of race

  6. Sault Ste. Marie Tr., Chippewa Indians v. U.S.

    288 F.3d 910 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 25 times
    Denying standing because plaintiff failed to offer any evidence that a casino forty miles away would detract from its business

  7. S.E.C. v. Dollar General Corp.

    378 F. App'x 511 (6th Cir. 2010)   Cited 15 times

    No. 09-5907. May 19, 2010. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Before: COOK and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; HOOD, Senior District Judge. The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. HOOD, Senior District Judge. This appeal arises from the district court's grant of an injunction prohibiting Appellant Brian Burr ("Burr") from pursuing his state court lawsuit against Appellee

  8. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,543 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  9. Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54   Cited 41,163 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"