12 Cited authorities

Landis v. North American Co.
299 U.S. 248 (1936) Cited 8,463 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"
Leyva v. Certified Grocers of Cal., Ltd.
593 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 1,108 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the arbitrator does have the power to determine whether various provisions in the contract are void
Filtrol Corporation v. Kelleher
467 F.2d 242 (9th Cir. 1973) Cited 83 times
Recognizing that a district court has discretion to stay proceedings pending the outcome of a separate action to "promote economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants" (quoting Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936))
Unwired Planet, LLC v. Square, Inc.
3:13-cv-00579-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2014) Cited 11 times
Finding that additional construction of certain terms would be an "exercise in redundancy" based on "the surrounding claim language that already limits the claims in the way Defendant proposes to do by limiting the meanings of the terms"
McDaniels v. Stewart
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05943-BHS-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 13, 2017) Cited 7 times
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-05943-BHS-DWC 01-13-2017 PETER J. MCDANIELS, Plaintiff, v. BELINDA STEWART et al., Defendants. David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY AND GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT The District Court has referred this action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to United States Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. This matter comes before the Court on: (1) Plaintiff's "Motion to Stay Issue #2" (hereinafter "Motion to Stay," Dkt. 140) and (2)
Stephens v. Comenity, LLC
287 F. Supp. 3d 1091 (D. Nev. 2017) Cited 4 times
Case No. 2:17–cv–00670–MMD–NJK 12-08-2017 Jennifer STEPHENS and Christopher Gulley on behalf of themselves, and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. COMENITY, LLC dba Comenity Bank, Defendant. Comenity LLC, Third–Party Plaintiff, v. Jackie Wasowicz, an individual, Third–Party Defendant. Alexis M. Wood, Kas L. Gallucci, Pro Hac Vice, Ronald A. Marron, Pro Hac Vice, Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron, San Diego, CA, Kevin L. Hernandez, Law Office of Kevin L. Hernandez, Henderson, NV, for Plaintiffs
Holland v. Island Creek Corp.
885 F. Supp. 4 (D.D.C. 1995) Cited 17 times
Civ. A. Nos. 87-1210 SSH, 87-1973 SSH and 90-1347 SSH. April 7, 1995. Julia Penny Clark, Ian David Lanoff, Bredhoff Kaiser, Jeremiah C. Collins, Williams Connolly, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs. Jonathan D. Schiller, Gary K. Harris, Randal S. Milch, Raymond Paretsky, Donovan, Leisure, Rogovin Schiller, Judith Ann Scott, Robert H. Stropp, Jr., Earl V. Brown, Jr., Int'l Brthd. of Teamsters, John R. Mooney, Paul A. Green, Hugh J. Beins, Beins, Axelrod, Osborne, Mooney Green, William I. Althen, Barbara
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 354,229 times 943 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Rule 72 - Magistrate Judges: Pretrial Order
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 Cited 172,183 times 20 Legal Analyses
Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order
Rule 55 - Default; Default Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 Cited 34,084 times 13 Legal Analyses
Adopting similar language for acquiring default judgment against the United States
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 22,753 times 16 Legal Analyses
Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose
Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 Cited 15,441 times 49 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"

Ringelberg v. Vanguard Integrity Professionals -Nevada, Inc. et al

12 Cited authorities

Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"

Holding that the arbitrator does have the power to determine whether various provisions in the contract are void

Recognizing that a district court has discretion to stay proceedings pending the outcome of a separate action to "promote economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants" (quoting Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936))

Finding that additional construction of certain terms would be an "exercise in redundancy" based on "the surrounding claim language that already limits the claims in the way Defendant proposes to do by limiting the meanings of the terms"

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order

Adopting similar language for acquiring default judgment against the United States

Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"