530 U.S. 133 (2000) Cited 21,088 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"
Holding that the plaintiff failed to show that comparators with the same employment responsibilities and the same supervisor were similarly situated, as the plaintiff failed to show they had similar employment history or had otherwise engaged in similar conduct
Holding a full year between Plaintiff's request for a reasonable accommodation and his demotion was inadequate without more facts to show a causal link between the protected activity and the adverse employment action he suffered
Finding sufficient evidence of pretext to preclude summary judgment where, among other things, "there was evidence that the [defendant's] policy did not reflect what actually occurred in practice"
Holding that the trial court properly dismissed the plaintiffs' NIED claim because it relied on the same facts supporting the plaintiffs' discrimination claim
Holding that an adverse party may not rest upon mere allegations or denials but must instead set forth specific facts showing the existence of a genuine issue for trial