7 Cited authorities

  1. Peretz v. United States

    501 U.S. 923 (1991)   Cited 775 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a criminal defendant in a felony trial may consent to jury selection presided over by a magistrate judge: no structural issues were implicated because magistrates were appointed and subject to removal by Article III judges; the district court made the ultimate decision to invoke the magistrate's assistance, subject to veto by the parties; and the decision whether to empanel the jury whose selection was overseen by the magistrate remained entirely with the trial judge
  2. R.F.M.A.S. Inc. v. Mimi so

    748 F. Supp. 2d 244 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)   Cited 103 times
    Finding experts in jewelry history and appraisal unqualified to testify as to whether particular trade dress was identifiable to consumers and distinctive, because neither expert had training in how the public perceived products
  3. Nikkal Industries, Ltd. v. Salton, Inc.

    689 F. Supp. 187 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)   Cited 81 times
    Affirming magistrate judge's findings that in prior relationship with party, expert was not retained and no privileged communications were divulged
  4. epicRealm, Licensing, LLC v. Autoflex Leasing, Inc.

    492 F. Supp. 2d 608 (E.D. Tex. 2007)   Cited 14 times
    Finding active inducement by providing instructions describing how to engage in an infringing use
  5. McEvily v. Sunbeam-Oster Co., Inc.

    878 F. Supp. 337 (D.R.I. 1994)   Cited 25 times
    Granting transfer in part based on Florida's local interest in the suit and the fairness of having a Florida jury decide the case
  6. Section 636 - Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment

    28 U.S.C. § 636   Cited 504,232 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, our review of the district court's resulting decision is for plain error so long as the party "has been served with notice that [this consequence] will result from a failure to object"
  7. Rule 72 - Magistrate Judges: Pretrial Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 72   Cited 168,170 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order