10 Cited authorities

Clinton v. Jones
520 U.S. 681 (1997) Cited 2,694 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding in Section 1983 action no absolute immunity for damages arising from "unofficial conduct"
Landis v. North American Co.
299 U.S. 248 (1936) Cited 8,276 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"
Virtualagility Inc. v. Salesforce.Com, Inc.
759 F.3d 1307 (Fed. Cir. 2014) Cited 199 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that second-guessing the PTAB's "more likely than not" determination that a CMB claim would be held invalid "amounts to an improper collateral attack" and that "allowing it would create serious practical problems"
Soverain Software LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
356 F. Supp. 2d 660 (E.D. Tex. 2005) Cited 130 times
Denying stay
Trebro Manufacturing, Inc. v. Firefly Equipment, LLC
748 F.3d 1159 (Fed. Cir. 2014) Cited 89 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court erred in construing a term in an independent claim to include a requirement recited in a dependent claim that also recited other features
Trover Grp., Inc. v. Dedicated Micros U.S.
Case No. 2:13-CV-1047-WCB (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2015) Cited 37 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that the concern of loss of documentary and testimonial evidence during a continued stay "is entitled to some weight, although the Court notes that the concern is general in nature, rather than specific..."
White Knuckle, IP, LLC v. Elec. Arts Inc.
Case No. 1:15-cv-00036-DN-BCW (D. Utah Aug. 23, 2015) Cited 24 times
Case No. 1:15-cv-00036-DN-BCW 08-23-2015 WHITE KNUCKLE, IP, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. District Judge David Nuffer MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells In Electronic Arts Inc.'s ("EA") Motion to Stay ("Motion"), EA argues that the case should be stayed, "including discovery and all pending deadlines," until a decision is rendered on EA's pending Motion for Judgment on
Ambato Media, LLC v. Clarion Co.
Case No.: 2:09-cv-242-JRG (E.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2012) Cited 15 times
Stating that ex parte reexamination proceedings "could take several years to reach resolution."
Section 101 - Inventions patentable
35 U.S.C. § 101 Cited 3,400 times 2189 Legal Analyses
Defining patentable subject matter as "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof."
Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions
35 U.S.C. § 315 Cited 535 times 879 Legal Analyses
Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al

10 Cited authorities

Holding in Section 1983 action no absolute immunity for damages arising from "unofficial conduct"

Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"

Holding that second-guessing the PTAB's "more likely than not" determination that a CMB claim would be held invalid "amounts to an improper collateral attack" and that "allowing it would create serious practical problems"

Denying stay

Holding that the district court erred in construing a term in an independent claim to include a requirement recited in a dependent claim that also recited other features

Finding that the concern of loss of documentary and testimonial evidence during a continued stay "is entitled to some weight, although the Court notes that the concern is general in nature, rather than specific..."

Stating that ex parte reexamination proceedings "could take several years to reach resolution."

Defining patentable subject matter as "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof."

Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent