§Why CasetextPricing

Rosenberg v. CCS Commercial, LLC et al

RESPONSE

19 Cited authorities

  1. Mabe v. San Bernardino County

    237 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 877 times
    Holding questions of fact remained on the issues of exigent circumstances, given that the sexual abuse last occurred more than a month before the removal, and a warrant likely could have been obtained within "a few hours"

  2. Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co.

    166 Wn. 2d 27 (Wash. 2009)   Cited 434 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant's practice of including miscellaneous service charges unrelated to the mortgage on a mortgage payoff statement "has the capacity to deceive because it creates the misleading appearance that the mortgage cannot be released unless the miscellaneous charges . . . are paid"

  3. Tank v. State Farm

    105 Wn. 2d 381 (Wash. 1986)   Cited 299 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that potential conflict created by reservation of rights mandates enhanced obligations of good faith for attorneys whose fees are covered by insurer

  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Cyberspace.com LLC

    453 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 113 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mailers purporting to be checks with small-print disclosures on the back were deceptive as a matter of law

  5. Engebretson v. Mahoney

    724 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2013)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that prison officials charged with executing facially valid court orders enjoy absolute immunity from § 1983 liability for conduct prescribed by those orders

  6. Rush v. Doe

    190 Wn. App. 945 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 58 times
    Outlining a three-part test for "unfair" acts and a separate standard for "deceptive" practices

  7. Schwarzschild v. Tse

    69 F.3d 293 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 92 times
    Holding that a judgment obtained before class certification is binding only upon the named plaintiffs

  8. State v. Kaiser

    160 Wn. App. 1035 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 42 times
    Finding a company that “preyed on property owners” by “falsely offering to help save the property from foreclosure” had committed an unfair and deceptive act under the CPA without reference to any specific statutory provision

  9. Postow v. Oba Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

    627 F.2d 1370 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 86 times
    Finding no abuse of discretion in trial court's refusal to vacate class certification even though final designation of the class and notice was sent to class members after summary judgment was granted

  10. State v. Mandatory Poster Agency, Inc.

    199 Wn. App. 506 (Wash. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 21 times

    No. 74978-1-I 07-03-2017 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. The MANDATORY POSTER AGENCY, INC., d/b/a Corporate Records Service, The Washington Labor Law Poster Service, Washington Food Service Compliance Center, and Steven J. Fata, Thomas Fata, and Joseph Fata, individually and in their corporate capacity, Appellant. Michael K. Vaska, Kathryn Carder McCoy, Jacqueline Constance Quarri, Foster Pepper PLLC, 1111 3rd Ave., Ste. 3000, Seattle, WA, 98101-3292, Philip Albert Talmadge, Talmadge/Fitzpatrick/Tribe

  11. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 34,923 times   1234 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"

  12. Section 46.29.060 - Application of sections requiring deposit of security and suspensions for failure to deposit security

    Wash. Rev. Code § 46.29.060   Cited 16 times

    The provisions of this chapter, requiring deposit of security and suspensions for failure to deposit security, subject to certain exemptions, shall apply to the driver and owner of any vehicle of a type subject to registration under the motor vehicle laws of this state which is in any manner involved in an accident within this state, which accident has resulted in bodily injury or death of any person or damage to the property of any one person to an apparent extent equal to or greater than the minimum

  13. Section 5-16-103 - Definitions

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 5-16-103   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    As used in this article 16, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) "Administrator" means the administrator of the "Uniform Consumer Credit Code", articles 1 to 9 of this title 5, whose office is created in the department of law in section 5-6-103. (2) Repealed. (3) (a) "Collection agency" means any: (I) Person who engages in a business the principal purpose of which is the collection of debts; or (II) Person who: (A) Regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly, debts owed

  14. Section 46.29.110 - Failure to deposit security-Suspensions

    Wash. Rev. Code § 46.29.110   Cited 1 times

    If a person required to deposit security under this chapter fails to deposit such security within sixty days after the department has sent the notice as hereinbefore provided, the department shall thereupon suspend: (1) The driver's license of each driver in any manner involved in the accident; (2) The driver's license of the owner of each vehicle of a type subject to registration under the laws of this state involved in the accident; (3) If the driver or owner is a nonresident, the privilege of

  15. Section 446-85-010 - Accident-reporting threshold

    Wash. Admin. Code § 446-85-010

    Beginning January 1, 2015, the accident-reporting threshold for property damage accidents will be one thousand dollars. Wash. Admin. Code § 446-85-010 Amended by WSR 14-24-117, Filed 12/3/2014, effective 1/3/2015 Statutory Authority: RCW 46.52.030. 00-10-092, § 446-85-010, filed 5/2/00, effective 5/3/00.