§Why CasetextPricing

Harney et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition

3 Cited authorities

  1. Brown v. Braddick

    595 F.2d 961 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding movants lacked standing because they were not in possession of the materials subpoenaed and had no personal right or privilege in the materials subpoenaed

  2. Kiger v. Plaisance Dragline Dredging Company, Inc.

    Civil Action No: 04-3153 Section: "K" (4) (E.D. La. Nov. 2, 2006)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No: 04-3153 Section: "K" (4). November 2, 2006 ORDER KAREN ROBY, Magistrate Judge Before the Court is a Motion to Quash Subpoenas (doc. # 82) filed by the plaintiff, Roy Kiger, seeking an order from this Court quashing two third party subpoenas issued by a defendant, Clarendon Insurance Company. Clarendon filed an opposition motion. The motion was heard on November 1, 2006. I. Background Kiger was a seaman working on the M/V U.S. Grant ("Grant") and the D/B Rebel 1 ("Rebel"). Plaisance

  3. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 94,817 times   651 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37