Camacho v. Bridgeport
523 F.3d 973 (9th Cir. 2008) Cited 1,470 times
Holding that fees-on-fees must be calculated using the lodestar method
Fisher Properties v. Arden-Mayfair
115 Wn. 2d 364 (Wash. 1990) Cited 142 times
Holding that use of remand term “determine” required the trial court to enter new findings and exercise discretion rather than simply recalculate
Crest Inc. v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
128 Wn. App. 760 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005) Cited 45 times
In Crest, the defendant general contractor acknowledged that it owed the plaintiff subcontractor money but would not pay prior to the judgment because the subcontractor refused to sign a general release.
Olsen Media v. Energy Sciences
32 Wn. App. 579 (Wash. Ct. App. 1982) Cited 39 times
Stating that an integration clause strongly supports the conclusion that the parties' agreement was fully integrated
Section 4.84.330 - Actions on contract or lease which provides that attorneys' fees and costs incurred to enforce provisions be awarded to one of parties-Prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees-Waiver prohibited
Wash. Rev. Code § 4.84.330 Cited 582 times 2 Legal Analyses
Defining "prevailing party" in actions on contract or lease as "the party in whose favor final judgment is rendered"