22 Cited authorities

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Oper. v. Brown
564 U.S. 915 (2011) Cited 5,253 times 86 Legal Analyses
Holding "the sales of petitioners' tires sporadically made in North Carolina through intermediaries" insufficient to support general jurisdiction
Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
471 U.S. 462 (1985) Cited 16,894 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.
BNSF Ry. Co. v. Tyrrell
137 S. Ct. 1549 (2017) Cited 586 times 25 Legal Analyses
Holding that because BNSF was "not incorporated in Montana and does not maintain its principal place of business there" or was otherwise "so heavily engaged in activity in Montana 'as to render [it] essentially at home' in that State," general jurisdiction was improper
Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Corp.
308 U.S. 165 (1939) Cited 727 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that venue is non-jurisdictional and can be waived
3D Systems, Inc. v. Aarotech Laboratories
160 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 1998) Cited 304 times
Holding that Federal Circuit law applies to personal jurisdiction over state law claims where the "resolution of the patent infringement issue" would be a "significant factor" in resolving those state law claims
Synthes v. G.M. Dos Reis Jr. Ind. Com. De Equip. Medico
563 F.3d 1285 (Fed. Cir. 2009) Cited 187 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding display of products at a trade show after the patent's issuance and "for the purpose of generating interest in infringing products" was a relevant jurisdictional contact
Display Works, LLC v. Bartley
182 F. Supp. 3d 166 (D.N.J. 2016) Cited 93 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "New Jersey's registration and service statutes do not constitute consent to general jurisdiction"
Graphic Cont. Corp. v. Utah Med. Prod
149 F.3d 1382 (Fed. Cir. 1998) Cited 130 times
Holding that the cease and desist letters are of "insufficient quality and degree to be considered the `transaction of business' under New York law because they do not constitute purposeful availment"
Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.
817 F.3d 755 (Fed. Cir. 2016) Cited 68 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that Daimler did not overrule the line of precedent that supports the idea that consent is independent from general personal jurisdiction
Otsuka Pharm. Co. v. Mylan Inc.
106 F. Supp. 3d 456 (D.N.J. 2015) Cited 63 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that registration to do business in New Jersey was sufficient consent to allow exercise of general personal jurisdiction
Section 636 - Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment
28 U.S.C. § 636 Cited 503,319 times 39 Legal Analyses
Holding that when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, our review of the district court's resulting decision is for plain error so long as the party "has been served with notice that [this consequence] will result from a failure to object"
Rule 21 - Misjoinder and Nonjoinder of Parties
Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 Cited 7,464 times 13 Legal Analyses
Granting district courts broad discretion when deciding whether to sever claims or to dismiss improperly joined claims or defendants
Section 14A:4-1 - Registered office and registered agent
N.J. Stat. § 14A:4-1 Cited 28 times
(1) Every corporation organized for any purpose under any general or special law of this State and every foreign corporation authorized to transact business in this State shall continuously maintain a registered office in this State, and a registered agent having a business office identical with such registered office. (2) The registered office may be, but need not be, the same as a place of business of the corporation which it serves. (3) The registered agent may be a natural person of the age of

Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al

22 Cited authorities

Holding "the sales of petitioners' tires sporadically made in North Carolina through intermediaries" insufficient to support general jurisdiction

Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.

Holding that because BNSF was "not incorporated in Montana and does not maintain its principal place of business there" or was otherwise "so heavily engaged in activity in Montana 'as to render [it] essentially at home' in that State," general jurisdiction was improper

Holding that venue is non-jurisdictional and can be waived

Holding that Federal Circuit law applies to personal jurisdiction over state law claims where the "resolution of the patent infringement issue" would be a "significant factor" in resolving those state law claims

Holding display of products at a trade show after the patent's issuance and "for the purpose of generating interest in infringing products" was a relevant jurisdictional contact

Holding that "New Jersey's registration and service statutes do not constitute consent to general jurisdiction"

Holding that the cease and desist letters are of "insufficient quality and degree to be considered the `transaction of business' under New York law because they do not constitute purposeful availment"

Holding that Daimler did not overrule the line of precedent that supports the idea that consent is independent from general personal jurisdiction

Holding that registration to do business in New Jersey was sufficient consent to allow exercise of general personal jurisdiction

Holding that when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, our review of the district court's resulting decision is for plain error so long as the party "has been served with notice that [this consequence] will result from a failure to object"

Granting district courts broad discretion when deciding whether to sever claims or to dismiss improperly joined claims or defendants