5 Cited authorities

  1. Frank v. U.S. West, Inc.

    3 F.3d 1357 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 1,660 times
    Holding that parent liable for subsidiary's discrimination only when the two are integrated enterprises
  2. Bylin v. Billings

    568 F.3d 1224 (10th Cir. 2009)   Cited 458 times
    Holding that "expenditure of time, money, and effort alone is not grounds for a finding of prejudice" when considering leave to amend
  3. Calderon v. Kansas Dept., Soc. Rehab. Ser

    181 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 1999)   Cited 425 times
    Holding that a "single sentence, lacking a statement for the grounds for amendment and dangling at the end of [appellant's] memorandum, did not rise to the level of a motion for leave to amend" and that motion for leave to amend was therefore "never properly before" district court
  4. Albers v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Jefferson Cnty.

    771 F.3d 697 (10th Cir. 2014)   Cited 216 times
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend when the plaintiffs had not filed a motion to amend or a proposed amended complaint
  5. Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc. v. AE Biofuels, Inc.

    663 F. Supp. 2d 1056 (D. Colo. 2009)   Cited 34 times
    Noting that the non-moving party bears the burden of showing that the proposed amendment is sought in bad faith, that it is futile, or that it would cause substantial prejudice, undue delay or injustice