11 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Kubrick

    444 U.S. 111 (1979)   Cited 2,590 times
    Holding that claim under Federal Tort Claims Act accrued when plaintiff possessed "critical facts that he has been hurt and who has inflicted the injury," and rejecting argument that "plaintiff's ignorance of his legal rights" deferred accrual
  2. Beck ex rel. Estate of Southeast Banking Corp. v. Lazard Freres & Co.

    175 F.3d 913 (11th Cir. 1999)   Cited 211 times
    Finding under Florida Law, the elements of a breach of contract action are a valid contract; a material breach; and damages
  3. May v. Illinois National Insurance Co.

    771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that nonclaim statute in probate code is “not subject to waiver or extension in the probate proceedings”
  4. Federal Insurance Co. v. Southwest Florida Retirement Center, Inc.

    707 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1998)   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Florida Supreme Court would not write into a statute of limitations a delayed discovery rule when the legislature itself had not done so explicitly, and that the legislature could make the necessary statutory change if that were its intent
  5. National Auto Service Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLC

    192 So. 3d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 2D14–3632. 03-30-2016 NATIONAL AUTO SERVICE CENTERS, INC., a Florida corporation; National Auto Properties, Inc., a Florida corporation; Leonard D. Levin, individually; Carol Levin, individually; Durant Holdings, LLC ; and Bedford Investments, LLC, Appellants, v. F/R 550, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; and F/R 3329, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellees. Stephen O. Cole and Nancy S. Paikoff of MacFarlane Ferguson & McMullen, Clearwater, and Michael J. Stanton of Stanton

  6. Connectus LLC v. Ampush Media, Inc.

    Case No. 8:15-cv-2778-T-33JSS (M.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2017)   Cited 1 times
    Concluding that a choice-of-law clause that applied to "all matters relating" to the parties' contract was "broad" and governed a tort claim related to performance under the contract
  7. Sabal Chase H. A. I. v. W. D. W. Co.

    726 So. 2d 796 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statute of repose was not subject to tolling provision applicable to statute of limitations because, among other reasons, it would “ignore fundamental distinctions between ordinary statutes of limitations and statutes of repose”
  8. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 346,675 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  9. Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 16   Cited 33,834 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)
  10. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,065 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"
  11. Section 95.031 - Computation of time

    Fla. Stat. § 95.031   Cited 628 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Delaying the start of the four-year limitations period for actions "founded upon fraud" until "the facts giving rise to the cause of action were discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence"