25 Cited authorities

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist.

    2 Cal.4th 962 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 1,196 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Aubry, supra, 42 Cal.App.4th 579 at pages 587 through 588, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 703, the court, citing language from Labor Council, held the Regents were not required to pay private contractors the prevailing wage under section 1770 et seq., which applies to public works, for the construction of student and staff housing.
  2. Jenkins v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

    216 Cal.App.4th 497 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 575 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a loan servicer, as agent for the beneficiary, may record a notice of default and initiate nonjudicial foreclosure
  3. TRB Investments, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

    40 Cal.4th 19 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 133 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding ambiguous a contract that is "capable of two or more constructions, both of which are reasonable"
  4. Farms v. Alkar-Rapidpak-Mp Equipment, Inc.

    868 F. Supp. 2d 983 (E.D. Cal. 2012)   Cited 68 times
    Holding that a promise to comply with the terms of a contract could not fraudulently induce the creation of a contract that had already been entered by the parties
  5. Salzman Sign Co. v. Beck

    10 N.Y.2d 63 (N.Y. 1961)   Cited 286 times
    Holding that a corporate officer's signing of a contract stating that "the officer or officers signing on behalf of such corporation, hereby personally guarantee the payments hereinabove provided for" did not provide sufficiently "direct and explicit evidence of actual intent" to be personally bound
  6. George v. Auto. Club of South. California

    201 Cal.App.4th 1112 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 47 times
    Applying rule, but finding no ambiguity
  7. Grey v. American Management Services

    204 Cal.App.4th 803 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that an employment contract superseded an employment application arbitration clause where employment contract contained a new arbitration clause and integration clause
  8. Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co.

    116 Cal.App.4th 968 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 55 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the California Unfair Business Competition Law allowed plaintiff to sue to enjoin the insurer's activity to benefit others even though plaintiff had never been personally injured by it
  9. Livonia Building v. Harrison Const

    276 Mich. App. 514 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 48 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that a presumption of misappropriation arose from the evidence that proceeds received from jobs were "disbursed on outstanding bills when monies became available without regard for the requirements of the MBTFA"
  10. G & W Warren's, Inc. v. Dabney

    11 Cal.App.5th 565 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 26 times
    Holding "contract formation is governed by objective manifestations, not subjective intent of any individual involved"