7 Cited authorities

  1. Cooper Industries v. Leatherman Tool Group

    532 U.S. 424 (2001)   Cited 802 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that constitutionality of jury's punitive damage award is subject to de novo review
  2. John R. v. Oakland Unified School Dist.

    48 Cal.3d 438 (Cal. 1989)   Cited 246 times
    Holding that individual instances of sexual harassment of students by teachers does not impute liability to the school districts under the doctrine of respondeat superior
  3. Kizer v. County of San Mateo

    53 Cal.3d 139 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 97 times
    In Kizer, the State Department of Health Services issued class AA and A citations under section 1424 to a long-term health care facility that was licensed and operated by the County of San Mateo ("County").
  4. People ex Rel. Younger v. Superior Court

    16 Cal.3d 30 (Cal. 1976)   Cited 115 times
    In Younger, supra, 16 Cal.3d 30, 127 Cal.Rptr. 122, 544 P.2d 1322, an enforcement action brought by the state, we assumed that section 818 was implicated insofar as the action was brought against a public entity, but held that the statute did not preclude the imposition of penalties to be paid into the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account (Wat. Code, § 13440) and dedicated to the remediation of the unquantifiable harms associated with oil spills.
  5. L.A. Cty. Met. Tran. v. Super. Ct. L.A. Cty

    123 Cal.App.4th 261 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 26 times
    Comparing punitive damages to other kinds of penalties
  6. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,254 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
  7. Rule 4.1 - Serving Other Process

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.1   Cited 244 times
    Instructing that "[p]rocess . . . may be served anywhere within the territorial limits of the state where the district court is located"