§Why CasetextPricing

Opposition Objections

undefined

16 Cited authorities

  1. BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Superior Court

    199 Cal.App.3d 1240 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)   Cited 109 times
    Holding that a court is "not reviewing the merits of a fraud cause of action" but is instead "reviewing the merits of a discovery order to determine if [a party] will have access to communications between [the opposing party] and its attorneys to aid [the party] in proving its causes of action."

  2. Cadle Co. v. World Wide Hospitality Furniture, Inc.

    144 Cal.App.4th 504 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 49 times
    Noting appellant's failure to file a new trial motion as one of several bases for rejecting an unauthorized jury waiver argument raised for the first time on appeal

  3. In re Marriage of Vomacka

    36 Cal.3d 459 (Cal. 1984)   Cited 76 times

    Docket No. S.F. 24672. July 16, 1984. Appeal from Superior Court of Contra Costa County, No. 192461, James H. Libbey, Temporary Judge. Pursuant to Constitution, article VI, section 21. COUNSEL Robert Vatuone, J.C. Borgman, Mark J. Eggleston and K. Randy Moore for Appellant. Hyde Brewer and R. Kent Brewer for Respondent. OPINION REYNOSO, J. Does a trial court have jurisdiction to extend spousal support payments past a date it has specified as the last opportunity the supported spouse may request such

  4. Cathay Bank v. Lee

    14 Cal.App.4th 1533 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 49 times
    Recognizing that "the usual rule [is] that ambiguities are construed against the drafter"

  5. Morgan Creek Residential v. Kemp

    153 Cal.App.4th 675 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 27 times
    Discussing whether party is a volunteer in the context of equitable subrogation

  6. Pacific Valley Bank v. Schwenke

    189 Cal.App.3d 134 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 53 times
    Describing deficiency obligation as "conditional" under California law

  7. Pacific Decision Sciences v. Superior Court

    121 Cal.App.4th 1100 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 23 times
    Noting that a writ of attachment may be levied against checks and money orders

  8. In re Marriage of Perkal

    203 Cal.App.3d 1198 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)   Cited 33 times
    Discussing predecessor statute to Fam. Code, § 2640, Civil Code former § 4800.2

  9. Bloom v. Bender

    48 Cal.2d 793 (Cal. 1957)   Cited 84 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the obligation of the surety remains, notwithstanding the fact that the statute of limitations has run on the obligation of the surety's principal

  10. In re Marriage of Moore

    113 Cal.App.3d 22 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 30 times
    Concluding that clear and convincing evidence "does not leave the matter to speculation"

  11. Section 2847 - Reimbursement if surety satisfies principal obligation

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2847   Cited 72 times

    If a surety satisfies the principal obligation, or any part thereof, whether with or without legal proceedings, the principal is bound to reimburse what he has disbursed, including necessary costs and expenses; but the surety has no claim for reimbursement against other persons, though they may have been benefited by his act, except as prescribed by the next section. Ca. Civ. Code § 2847 Enacted 1872.

  12. Section 2848 - Enforcement of remedies creditor has against principal upon satisfaction of obligation

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2848   Cited 66 times

    A surety, upon satisfying the obligation of the principal, is entitled to enforce every remedy which the creditor then has against the principal to the extent of reimbursing what he has expended, and also to require all his co-sureties to contribute thereto, without regard to the order of time in which they became such. Ca. Civ. Code § 2848 Enacted 1872.

  13. Section 2849 - Entitled to benefit of every security for performance of principal obligation held by creditor

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2849   Cited 60 times

    A surety is entitled to the benefit of every security for the performance of the principal obligation held by the creditor, or by a co-surety at the time of entering into the contract of suretyship, or acquired by him afterwards, whether the surety was aware of the security or not. Ca. Civ. Code § 2849 Enacted 1872.

  14. Section 2846 - Compelling principal to perform obligation

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2846   Cited 18 times

    A surety may compel his principal to perform the obligation when due. Ca. Civ. Code § 2846 Enacted 1872.