§Why CasetextPricing

Order Submitted Matter

undefined

17 Cited authorities

  1. Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp.

    971 F.3d 834 (9th Cir. 2020)   Cited 454 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[plaintiff] must establish that [he/she] lacks an adequate remedy at law before securing equitable restitution for past harm under the UCL and CLRA"

  2. Arias v. Superior Court (Angelo Dairy)

    46 Cal.4th 969 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 607 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that proof of a Labor Code violation is a prerequisite to recovery of PAGA penalties

  3. Williams v. Superior Court

    3 Cal.5th 531 (Cal. 2017)   Cited 241 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Concluding fear of retaliation cuts in favor of "facilitating collective actions so that individual employees need not run the risk of individual suits"

  4. C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School District

    53 Cal.4th 861 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 225 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding that supervisory personnel could be vicariously liable and noting that "public school personnel may be individually liable for their negligent failure to protect students from harm at others' hands"

  5. Tellez v. Rich Voss Trucking, Inc.

    240 Cal.App.4th 1052 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 98 times   1 Legal Analyses

    H040375 09-30-2015 Miguel TELLEZ Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RICH VOSS TRUCKING, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. Matern Law Group, Matthew J. Matern, Torrance, Rania S. Habib, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellant. Miller, Morton, Caillat & Nevis, David I. Kornbluh, Stephanie M. Rocha, San Jose, Courtney J. Rogerson, Counsel for Defendants/Respondents. ELIA, J. Matern Law Group, Matthew J. Matern, Torrance, Rania S. Habib, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellant. Miller, Morton, Caillat & Nevis, David

  6. Casterson v. Superior Court

    101 Cal.App.4th 177 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 102 times
    In Casterson, the plaintiff asserted section 35330's immunity should not be construed to protect a district's employee for injuries caused by the employee's negligence during the field trip because subdivision (d) did not expressly cover employees, while other provisions of the Education Code limiting liability for personal injuries did expressly cover employees.

  7. Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran

    179 Cal.App.4th 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 80 times
    Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"

  8. Prudential Home Mortgage Co. v. Superior Court

    66 Cal.App.4th 1236 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 104 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statutory relief under the UCL "is subject to fundamental equitable principles, including inadequacy of the legal remedy."

  9. CLD Construction, Inc. v. City of San Ramon

    120 Cal.App.4th 1141 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 87 times
    Remarking that representation by an attorney "is not an absolute prerequisite to the court's fundamental power to hear or determine a case ... it is more appropriate and just to treat a corporation's failure to be represented by an attorney as a defect that may be corrected ... in the sound discretion of the court"

  10. Birke v. Oakwood Worldwide

    169 Cal.App.4th 1540 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 56 times
    Holding aggravation of asthma and chronic allergies from breathing secondhand smoke in apartment complex's outdoor common area sufficient to authorize private action for public nuisance