16 Cited authorities

  1. Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens

    574 U.S. 81 (2014)   Cited 4,536 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding removal notice need only contain short and plain statement of grounds for court's jurisdiction
  2. Singer v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

    116 F.3d 373 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1,064 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff's admission in open court established amount in controversy
  3. Galt G/S v. JSS Scandinavia

    142 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 482 times
    Holding that attorney's fees can be counted toward the amount in controversy requirement when a statute allows such fees
  4. Brady v. Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc.

    243 F. Supp. 2d 1004 (N.D. Cal. 2002)   Cited 159 times
    Holding that Song-Beverly Act's civil penalties should be included in the amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction
  5. The Kenneth Rothschild Trust v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter

    199 F. Supp. 2d 993 (C.D. Cal. 2002)   Cited 147 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding courts assume factual allegations in complaint are true when determining amount in controversy
  6. Dist. of Columbia v. Murphy

    314 U.S. 441 (1941)   Cited 215 times
    Stating that the "question of domicile" is "to be settled" by reviewing the " indicia of where a man's home is"
  7. Lewis v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

    348 F. Supp. 2d 932 (W.D. Tenn. 2004)   Cited 7 times
    Finding that the jurisdictional threshold was met, in spite of an allegation in the complaint that "neither Plaintiff nor any class member asserts a claim in excess of $75,000," when the complaint demanded "judgment to be determined by a jury, for all incidental, consequential, compensatory and punitive damages"
  8. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 112,046 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"
  9. Section 1441 - Removal of civil actions

    28 U.S.C. § 1441   Cited 50,302 times   151 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[a]ny civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising under the ... laws of the United States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties.”
  10. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 48,898 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."
  11. Section 1446 - Procedure for removal of civil actions

    28 U.S.C. § 1446   Cited 21,929 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Granting a defendant 30 days to remove after receipt of the first pleading that sets forth a removable claim
  12. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,923 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  13. Section 226 - Itemized statement of wages

    Cal. Lab. Code § 226   Cited 2,257 times   125 Legal Analyses
    Providing only statutory penalties
  14. Section 203 - Failure to pay; penalties

    Cal. Lab. Code § 203   Cited 1,632 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Providing that any willfully unpaid wages "shall continue as a penalty from the due date thereof at the same rate until paid or until an action therefor is commenced"
  15. Section 510 - Eight hour workday; compensation for overtime

    Cal. Lab. Code § 510   Cited 1,601 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Requiring employers to pay 1.5 times the "regular rate of pay" for overtime
  16. Section 84 - California

    28 U.S.C. § 84   Cited 1,428 times
    Stating Amador County is part of Eastern District of California