19 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 52,248 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
  2. Schifando v. City of Los Angeles

    31 Cal.4th 1074 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,258 times
    Denying request where the materials sought to be judicially noticed were not particularly supportive of the respondent's cause or relevant to the action and noting that "[n]o party has alleged" what the amicus curiae had purported to respond to
  3. Green v. Ralee Engineering Co

    19 Cal.4th 66 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 481 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employee who reported the sale of defective aircraft parts did state a claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy because his action was directly connected to federal regulation of air safety
  4. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

    27 Cal.3d 167 (Cal. 1980)   Cited 835 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that at-will employees may recover tort damages from employers if they can show they were discharged in contravention of fundamental public policy
  5. Doe v. City of Los Angeles

    42 Cal.4th 531 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 258 times
    Holding courts construing California statutes "may not broaden or narrow the scope of the provision by reading into it language that does not appear in it or reading out of it language that does."
  6. Mokler v. County of Orange

    157 Cal.App.4th 121 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 227 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding three offensive encounters involving no physical threats over a five-week period not "severe or pervasive" as a matter of law
  7. Collier v. Superior Court

    228 Cal.App.3d 1117 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 87 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employee who alleged he was fired in retaliation for reporting illegal activity to his employer, but not to a government agency, stated viable claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy
  8. Nagy v. Nagy

    210 Cal.App.3d 1262 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 70 times
    Holding that claims of fraud require particularized pleading
  9. Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.

    26 Cal.2d 149 (Cal. 1945)   Cited 76 times
    In Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 26 Cal.2d 149, 151 [ 157 P.2d 1], the court said: "In considering whether the judgment on the pleadings was properly granted, it is but necessary to determine the sufficiency of the complaint upon the same principle as though it had been attacked by general demurrer.
  10. Harvey v. City of Holtville

    271 Cal.App.2d 816 (Cal. Ct. App. 1969)   Cited 16 times
    In Harvey the public entity notified the claimant that the claim was denied, as a result of which (according to plaintiff's contention) plaintiff did not file a petition for relief in the superior court within the ensuing 20-day period then required by section 912 (later repealed): the court held that the claimant should be given the opportunity to plead and prove the elements of estoppel and, if appropriate, be allowed to proceed.
  11. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,113 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
  12. Section 226 - Itemized statement of wages

    Cal. Lab. Code § 226   Cited 2,247 times   125 Legal Analyses
    Providing only statutory penalties
  13. Section 1102.5 - Whistleblower protection

    Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5   Cited 1,190 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Making it unlawful for an employer to impose any policy which "prevent an employee from disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency ... or to another employee who has authority to investigate, discover, or correct the violation or noncompliance"
  14. Section 1198.5 - Right of employee to inspect and receive copy of personnel records

    Cal. Lab. Code § 1198.5   Cited 126 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Defining "personnel records" as those files "that the employer maintains relating to the employee's performance or to grievances concerning the employee"
  15. Section 1 - Short title

    Cal. Lab. Code § 1   Cited 74 times

    This act shall be known as the Labor Code. Ca. Lab. Code § 1 Enacted by Stats. 1937, Ch. 90.

  16. Section 8 - Writings; notice; mailing

    Cal. Lab. Code § 8   Cited 65 times
    Setting out federal unfair labor practices
  17. Section 432 - Copy of instrument

    Cal. Lab. Code § 432   Cited 26 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Requiring an employer to produce, upon request, any employment related document an employee signed
  18. Section 88 - Personnel records

    Cal. Lab. Code § 88

    The personnel records of all employees transferred pursuant to Section 87 shall remain in the Department of Industrial Relations. Ca. Lab. Code § 88 Added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 746.

  19. Rule 2.251 - Electronic service

    Cal. R. 2.251   Cited 15 times

    (a)Authorization for electronic service When a document may be served by mail, express mail, overnight delivery, or fax transmission, the document may be served electronically under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6, Penal Code section 690.5, and the rules in this chapter. For purposes of electronic service made pursuant to Penal Code section 690.5, express consent to electronic service is required.[]= (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2022; previously amended effective January 1, 2007