5 Cited authorities

  1. St. Mary v. Superior Court

    223 Cal.App.4th 762 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 65 times
    Noting that under section 2033.280, "a propounding party must take affirmative steps—by bringing a formal 'deemed admitted' motion—to have RFAs to which timely responses are not received deemed admitted"
  2. Deyo v. Kilbourne

    84 Cal.App.3d 771 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 152 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Deyo, it was held that the materiality of questions propounded to a particular claim or a defense should be considered as a factor in assessing the propriety of entering a dismissal or a default judgment for failure to answer.
  3. Redwood Empire v. Gombos

    82 Cal.App.4th 352 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 19 times
    Upholding a finding of implied public dedication of a one-lane dirt road in the Santa Cruz Mountains
  4. Hillman v. Stults

    263 Cal.App.2d 848 (Cal. Ct. App. 1968)   Cited 41 times
    In Hillman, a prison inmate filed an action seeking an accounting and to impress a trust upon property transferred to his sister.
  5. Cembrook v. Superior Court

    56 Cal.2d 423 (Cal. 1961)   Cited 44 times
    In Cembrook the defendant objected to approximately 40 requests for admissions of facts, moving to strike the requests and to be relieved of the necessity of providing any answer.