§Why CasetextPricing

Response Reply

undefined

9 Cited authorities

  1. Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. Wilkoski

    78 Cal.App.3d 477 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 69 times
    In Canal-Randolph Anaheim Inc. v. Wilkoski (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 477 [144 Cal.Rptr. 474], the Court of Appeal held that section 3802, subdivision (1)(b), did not apply to suspend the obligation to pay rent where defendant-tenant tendered a rent check to plaintiff-landlord.

  2. Folberg v. Clara G.R. Kinney Co.

    104 Cal.App.3d 136 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 25 times

    Docket No. 47478. April 2, 1980. Appeal from Superior Court of Santa Clara County, No. 412069, Bruce F. Allen, Judge. COUNSEL Gary L. Olimpia, Patricia D. Daniel and Kelly, Leal Olimpia for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Thomas L. Fike, Betty B. Bennett and Strellis Fike for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION CHRISTIAN, J. Harry Folberg and Vivian Folberg (lessors) sued Clara G.R. Kinney Company, Inc. (lessee) seeking restitution of leased premises and damages for unpaid public improvement assessments

  3. Schulman v. Vera

    108 Cal.App.3d 552 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 23 times
    Stating that under a commercial lease, “parties are more likely to have equal bargaining power” than is the case under a residential lease

  4. Adler v. Elphick

    184 Cal.App.3d 642 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 10 times

    Docket No. A033782. August 20, 1986. Appeal from Municipal Court for the Berkeley-Albany Judicial District of Alameda County, No. 54793, Anthony P. Bellante, Judge. Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. COUNSEL Samuel E. Trosow for Defendant and Appellant. Manuela Albuquerque, City Attorney, and Marjorie Gelb, Deputy City Attorney, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant. Fred M. Feller, York, Buresh Kaplan, James S. Ader and Jethro S. Busch for Plaintiffs and Respondents

  5. Lehr v. Crosby

    123 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 (Cal. Super. 1981)   Cited 7 times

    123 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 177 Cal.Rptr. 96 Alexander LEHR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Ethel CROSBY, Defendant and Respondent, Myra Hazlett, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. A. No. 14801. Superior Court of California, Appellate Division, Los Angeles County July 7, 1981. [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Salishs&s Jordan and Steven Weiner, Walnut Creek, for plaintiff and appellant. Linton Joaquin, Keene, for defendant and appellant and for defendant respondent. FOSTER, Judge

  6. Espinoza v. Rossini

    247 Cal.App.2d 40 (Cal. Ct. App. 1966)   Cited 15 times
    In Espinoza v. Rossini (1966) 247 Cal.App.2d 40, 45-46 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 205], the trial court ruled on timely new trial and JNOV motions on successive days, in violation of section 629's requirement that both motions be decided at the same time.

  7. Chambers v. Security Commercial & Savings Bank

    46 Cal.App. 32 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)   Cited 4 times

    Civ. No. 3247. February 6, 1920. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. W. A. Sloane, Judge. Judgment ordered modified. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hunsaker, Britt Edwards, Crouch Chambers and Hunsaker, Britt Cosgrove for Appellant. Sweet, Stearns and Forward for Respondent. JAMES, J. — This action was brought to recover possession of certain real property, the prayer being for restitution of the premises and "for the sum of eighteen thousand dollars

  8. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,480 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  9. Section 15 - Joint authority given to three or more public officers or persons

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 15   Cited 49 times
    Requiring that the Court “freely give” leave to amend when “justice so requires”