15 Cited authorities

  1. W.W.W. Assocs v. Giancontieri

    77 N.Y.2d 157 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 1,949 times
    Holding that extrinsic evidence was immaterial, in part because the contract plainly manifested intent that all prior understandings were merged into the contract, which expressed the parties' full agreement
  2. Leader v. Maroney

    97 N.Y.2d 95 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 613 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts have discretion to decide whether to extend time to serve for good cause shown or in the interest of justice
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 397 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
  4. District Council 37 v. City of New York

    22 A.D.3d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 29 times
    Noting that the court “typically” defers to the expertise of the Board in its interpretation of the NYCCBL
  5. Economico v. Vil. of Pelham

    50 N.Y.2d 120 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 66 times
    Holding in the context of a POL § 73 discharge that there is no need for a hearing when there is no dispute that an employee was absent from work for over a year on account of a non-service related disability
  6. Antinore v. State of New York

    49 A.D.2d 6 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)   Cited 71 times
    Finding collective bargaining agreements made by "a reciprocal negotiation between forces with strengths on both sides, reflecting the reconciled interests of employer and employees, voluntarily entered into" can waive due process rights
  7. In re City of N.Y. v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Assoc.

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 9314 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 205. Argued November 18, 2009. Decided December 17, 2009. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered October 16, 2008. The Appellate Division (1) reversed, on the law, a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Lottie E. Wilkins, J.), entered in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, which had (a) granted the petition to review the determinations of New York City Board of Collective

  8. In re New York City

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 1387 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that New York statute that gave public employees the right to “form, join, and participate in ... any employee organization of their own choosing” did not confer the Weingarten right; “Since the ‘mutual aid or protection’ language is absent from [the New York statute], Weingarten does not support a holding that [the statute] creates a Weingarten right”
  9. Antinore v. State of New York

    40 N.Y.2d 921 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 56 times

    Argued October 12, 1976 Decided November 16, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, LYMAN H. SMITH, J. Donald E. Grossfield for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (John Q. Driscoll and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondents. Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion by Mr. Justice FRANK DEL VECCHIO at the Appellate Division except insofar as the opinion refers to the necessity for importing particular procedural safeguards

  10. Roberts v. N.Y.C. Office of Collective Bargaining

    113 A.D.3d 97 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 2 times

    2013-11-26 In re Lillian ROBERTS, etc., et al., Petitioners–Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING, et al., Respondents–Respondents. Mary J. O'Connell, New York (Steven E. Sykes of counsel), for appellants. John F. Wirenius, and Michael T. Fois, New York, for The New York City Office of Collective Bargaining, Board of Collective Bargaining and Marlene Gold, respondents. DAVID FRIEDMAN Mary J. O'Connell, New York (Steven E. Sykes of counsel), for appellants. John F. Wirenius