§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of City of New York, et al., Appellants,v.New York State Nurses Association, et al., Respondents.

Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. Conley v. Gibson

    355 U.S. 41 (1957)   Cited 58,501 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"

  2. Matter of Wilhelm

    88 A.D.2d 6 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)   Cited 173 times

    July 9, 1982 Appeal from the Cattaraugus County Surrogate's Court, EDWARD M. HOREY, S. Kavinoky Cook ( Wayne D. Wisbaum and William R. Brennan of counsel), for appellant pro se. Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine Huber ( William A. Bain, Jr., of counsel), for appellant pro se. Torrance B. Brooks, guardian ad litem, respondent. Frederick J. Gram, guardian ad litem, respondent. SIMONS, J.P. Counsel for the trustee, Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine Huber, and for the objectants, Kavinoky and Cook

  3. LaSonde v. Seabrook

    89 A.D.3d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 66 times

    2011-11-3 In re Chandra LaSONDE, et al., Petitioners–Respondents, v. Norman SEABROOK, etc., et al., Respondents–Appellants. Koehler & Isaacs LLP, New York (Howard G. Wien of counsel), for appellants. Carter & Associate Attorney, PLLC, New York (Damond J. Carter of counsel), for respondents. DAVID B. SAXE Koehler & Isaacs LLP, New York (Howard G. Wien of counsel), for appellants. Carter & Associate Attorney, PLLC, New York (Damond J. Carter of counsel), for respondents. DAVID B. SAXE, J.P., DAVID

  4. City of N.Y. v. N.Y. State Nurses Ass'n

    130 A.D.3d 28 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 14 times

    2015-05-26 In re the CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Petitioners–Respondents, v. NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION, et al., Respondents–Appellants. Cohen, Weiss and Simon LLP, New York (Joseph Vitale and Travis M. Mastroddi of counsel), for New York State Nurses Association and Karen A. Ballard, appellants. Philip L. Maier, New York (Abigail R. Levy and John F. Wirenius of counsel), for the Board of Collective Bargaining of the City of New York and Marlene Gold, appellants. ROLANDO T. ACOSTA Cohen, Weiss

  5. 60 Market Street Associates v. Hartnett

    153 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that the construction of a building to house the county social services department was not for public use because the primary goal was private profit

  6. Matter of Antonopoulou v. Beame

    32 N.Y.2d 126 (N.Y. 1973)   Cited 52 times
    In Matter of Antonopoulou v Beame (32 N.Y.2d 126), a full-time lecturer was placed on maternity leave by the university from September 1, 1969 through June 30, 1970.

  7. Pfau v. Public Employment Relations Board

    69 A.D.3d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 5 times

    No. 507057. January 14, 2010. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Devine, J.), entered February 25, 2009 in Albany County, which, among other things, granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of respondent Public Employment Relations Board. David P. Quinn, New York State Public Employment, Relations Board, Albany, for Public Employment Relations Board, appellant. Mary J. O'Connell, AFSCME AFL-CIO, New York, City (Thomas Cooke

  8. Matter of Civil Service Employees v. Newman

    88 A.D.2d 685 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)   Cited 34 times

    May 6, 1982 Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Public Employment Relations Board which dismissed three improper practice charges brought by petitioners. The issue to be decided in this proceeding to review a determination of respondent Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) is whether respondent properly concluded that petitioner Civil Service Employees Association

  9. Matter of Civil Serv. Employees Assn. Inc. v. Newman

    61 N.Y.2d 1001 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 24 times

    Argued February 14, 1984 Decided March 27, 1984 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( John Q. Driscoll and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for appellants. Jerome Thier and Martin L. Barr for Harold R. Newman, as Chairman of the Public Employment Relations Board and others, respondents. Marjorie E. Karowe for Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., respondent. James R. Sandner and Susan Bloom Jones for Public Employees

  10. Matter of Siwek

    39 N.Y.2d 159 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 31 times
    Stating "Data culled from public records is, of course, a proper subject of judicial notice"

  11. Section 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review