64 Cited authorities

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (1966) Cited 60,311 times 64 Legal Analyses
Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment
Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
473 U.S. 432 (1985) Cited 9,705 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that mental disability is not a quasi-suspect class
Board of Regents v. Roth
408 U.S. 564 (1972) Cited 14,680 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that where a public employee's appointment terminated on a particular date and there was no provision for renewal after that date, the employee "did not have a property interest sufficient to require . . . a hearing when [the officials] declined to renew his contract of employment."
Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm'n
558 U.S. 310 (2010) Cited 1,590 times 72 Legal Analyses
Holding that disclaimer and disclosure requirements are subject to exacting scrutiny
Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams
532 U.S. 105 (2001) Cited 1,537 times 52 Legal Analyses
Holding that the phrase "any other class of workers engaged in ... commerce," following the specific examples of seamen and railroad employees, includes only "transportation workers," because construing it to include all other workers "fails to give independent effect to the statute’s enumeration of the specific categories of workers" that precede it
Kolender v. Lawson
461 U.S. 352 (1983) Cited 3,041 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding state misdemeanor statute unconstitutionally vague within the meaning of the Due Process Clause
Grayned v. City of Rockford
408 U.S. 104 (1972) Cited 4,715 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statute's words, even when "marked by flexibility and reasonable breadth, rather than meticulous specificity," are clear based on "what the ordinance as a whole prohibits"
Buckley v. Valeo
424 U.S. 1 (1976) Cited 3,412 times 37 Legal Analyses
Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression
Goss v. Lopez
419 U.S. 565 (1975) Cited 2,819 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that Ohio's public school disciplinary procedures were insufficient to protect students' property interest in public education
Whalen v. Roe
429 U.S. 589 (1977) Cited 1,726 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that New York's collection of prescription records in a computerized database did not violate patients' and physicians' right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Section 5501 - Scope of review
N.Y. CPLR 5501 Cited 7,203 times 2 Legal Analyses
Stating that the “shocks the conscience” standard “was relaxed in 1986 in tort actions, including the common personal injury and wrongful death actions in which additur and remittitur are most often seen”
Section 5601 - Appeals to the court of appeals as of right
N.Y. CPLR 5601 Cited 2,357 times
(a) Dissent. An appeal may be taken to the court of appeals as of right in an action originating in the supreme court, a county court, a surrogate's court, the family court, the court of claims or an administrative agency, from an order of the appellate division which finally determines the action, where there is a dissent by at least two justices on a question of law in favor of the party taking such appeal. (b) Constitutional grounds. An appeal may be taken to the court of appeals as of right:
Section R5522 - Disposition of appeal
N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 5522 Cited 117 times
(a) A court to which an appeal is taken may reverse, affirm, or modify, wholly or in part, any judgment, or order before it, as to any party. The court shall render a final determination or, where necessary or proper, remit to another court for further proceedings. A court reversing or modifying a judgment or order without opinion shall briefly state the grounds of its decision. (b) In an appeal from a money judgment in an action in which an itemized verdict is required by rule forty-one hundred
Section 2808 - Residential health care facilities; rates of payment
N.Y. Pub. Health Law § 2808 Cited 78 times
1-a. Notwithstanding sections one hundred twelve and one hundred sixty-three of the state finance law and any other inconsistent provision of law, the commissioner shall make grants to public residential health care facilities without a competitive bid or request for proposal process for the purposes of addressing the overall increases in input costs borne by such facilities. Such modifications shall also be primarily intended to promote the provision of quality health care, quality operation, updated
Section 240.15c3-1 - Net capital requirements for brokers or dealers
17 C.F.R. § 240.15c3-1 Cited 75 times 2 Legal Analyses
(a) Every broker or dealer must at all times have and maintain net capital no less than the greater of the highest minimum requirement applicable to its ratio requirement under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or to any of its activities under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, and must otherwise not be "insolvent" as that term is defined in paragraph (c)(16) of this section. In lieu of applying paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, an OTC derivatives dealer shall maintain net capital pursuant
Section 400.19 - Withdrawal of equity or assets
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 10 § 400.19 Cited 3 times
(a)Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (1) The term equity means: (i) any right or claim to assets; (ii) any interest in property or in a business, subject to claims of creditors; (iii) the difference between assets and liabilities; (iv) net worth. (2) The term asset means any owned physical object or any right having economic value to its owner or any item or source of wealth expressed, for accounting purposes, in terms of its cost, depreciated

Brightonian Nursing Home, et al., Respondents,v.Richard F. Daines, M.D., Commissioner of Health, State of New York, et al., Appellants.

64 Cited authorities

Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment

Holding that mental disability is not a quasi-suspect class

Holding that where a public employee's appointment terminated on a particular date and there was no provision for renewal after that date, the employee "did not have a property interest sufficient to require . . . a hearing when [the officials] declined to renew his contract of employment."

Holding that disclaimer and disclosure requirements are subject to exacting scrutiny

Holding state misdemeanor statute unconstitutionally vague within the meaning of the Due Process Clause

Holding that a statute's words, even when "marked by flexibility and reasonable breadth, rather than meticulous specificity," are clear based on "what the ordinance as a whole prohibits"

Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression

Holding that Ohio's public school disciplinary procedures were insufficient to protect students' property interest in public education

Holding that New York's collection of prescription records in a computerized database did not violate patients' and physicians' right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Stating that the “shocks the conscience” standard “was relaxed in 1986 in tort actions, including the common personal injury and wrongful death actions in which additur and remittitur are most often seen”