§Why CasetextPricing

Brightonian Nursing Home, et al., Respondents,v.Richard F. Daines, M.D., Commissioner of Health, State of New York, et al., Appellants.

Brief

30 Cited authorities

  1. Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.

    473 U.S. 432 (1985)   Cited 9,702 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mental disability is not a quasi-suspect class

  2. Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm'n

    558 U.S. 310 (2010)   Cited 1,588 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Holding that disclaimer and disclosure requirements are subject to exacting scrutiny

  3. Blum v. Yaretsky

    457 U.S. 991 (1982)   Cited 2,788 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nursing home is not a state actor in part because provision of nursing home services is not a traditional and exclusive sovereign function

  4. Laird v. Tatum

    408 U.S. 1 (1972)   Cited 1,390 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a defendant's chilling claims stemmed from government surveillance techniques and not a proscriptive regulation, “[a]llegations of a subjective ‘chill’ [were] not an adequate substitute for a claim of specific present objective harm or a threat of specific future harm”

  5. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus

    438 U.S. 234 (1978)   Cited 806 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding state law retroactively modifying compensation the company had agreed to pay to its employees impaired its contractual relationship by imposing a completely unexpected liability

  6. Williams v. Town of Greenburgh

    535 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 300 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although there is a right to intrastate movement, "it would distort the right to free travel beyond recognition to construe it as providing a substantive right to cross a particular parcel of land, enter a chosen dwelling, or gain admittance to a specific government building"

  7. Sanitation Recycling v. City of New York

    107 F.3d 985 (2d Cir. 1997)   Cited 214 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a New York City ordinance enacted to eradicate vestiges of criminal control in the carting industry did not violate the Commerce Clause

  8. Buffalo Teachers Federation v. Tobe

    464 F.3d 362 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a wage freeze was reasonable and necessary because the city took "more drastic measures" to alleviate financial stress before turning to freeze

  9. Lochner v. New York

    198 U.S. 45 (1905)   Cited 917 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a law setting maximum working hours

  10. In re Walton

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8665 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 118 times
    In Walton, the Department of Correctional Services contracted with a telecommunications company to provide phone service in prisons.

  11. Section 400.19 - Withdrawal of equity or assets

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 10 § 400.19   Cited 3 times

    (a)Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (1) The term equity means: (i) any right or claim to assets; (ii) any interest in property or in a business, subject to claims of creditors; (iii) the difference between assets and liabilities; (iv) net worth. (2) The term asset means any owned physical object or any right having economic value to its owner or any item or source of wealth expressed, for accounting purposes, in terms of its cost, depreciated