§Why CasetextPricing

Flo & Eddie, Inc., a California Corporation, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Respondent,v.Sirius XM Radio, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Appellant, Does, 1 through 10, Defendants.

Brief

4 Cited authorities

  1. Capitol Records v. Naxos

    4 N.Y.3d 540 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 49 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that New York's common-law protection for pre-1972 recordings continues until federal preemption occurs

  2. Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.

    62 F. Supp. 3d 325 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)   Cited 12 times
    Interpreting Naxos and other New York authority to predict that "the New York Court of Appeals would recognize the exclusive right to public performance of a sound recording as one of the rights appurtenant to common law copyright in such a recording"

  3. Section 106 - Exclusive rights in copyrighted works

    17 U.S.C. § 106   Cited 3,745 times   107 Legal Analyses
    Granting the owners of copyrights in “literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works” the exclusive right “to display the copyrighted work publicly”

  4. Section 114 - Scope of exclusive rights in sound recordings

    17 U.S.C. § 114   Cited 103 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Applying to a "transmitting entity" that "offers transmissions of visual images contemporaneously with transmissions of sound recordings" as in a cable or internet transmission