§Why CasetextPricing

Flo & Eddie, Inc., a California Corporation, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Respondent,v.Sirius XM Radio, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Appellant, Does, 1 through 10, Defendants.

Brief

24 Cited authorities

  1. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.

    510 U.S. 517 (1994)   Cited 2,820 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the Copyright Act fee-shifting statute, 17 U.S.C. § 505, defendants and plaintiffs are to be treated the same, contrary to the Court's interpretation of § 1988

  2. Rogers v. Tennessee

    532 U.S. 451 (2001)   Cited 651 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court's abrogation of the common law "year and a day" rule for murder was not a violation of the Ex Post Facto clause

  3. Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

    464 U.S. 417 (1984)   Cited 967 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding identical copying of videotapes under unique circumstances of case “[did] not have its ordinary effect of militating against a finding of fair use”

  4. Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    136 S. Ct. 1979 (2016)   Cited 254 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts must give substantial weight to the objective reasonableness of losing party's position when awarding fees

  5. Goldstein v. California

    412 U.S. 546 (1973)   Cited 233 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal copyright law does not preempt state copyright law providing greater protection

  6. Roy Export Estab. v. Columbia Broadcasting

    672 F.2d 1095 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 279 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding no preemption where the claims were based on the misappropriation of different works

  7. Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.

    804 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2015)   Cited 93 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an online book archive was "highly transformative" because it served the purpose of allowing users to search books for terms of interest

  8. Capitol Records v. Naxos

    4 N.Y.3d 540 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 49 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that New York's common-law protection for pre-1972 recordings continues until federal preemption occurs

  9. Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.

    62 F. Supp. 3d 325 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)   Cited 12 times
    Interpreting Naxos and other New York authority to predict that "the New York Court of Appeals would recognize the exclusive right to public performance of a sound recording as one of the rights appurtenant to common law copyright in such a recording"

  10. Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.

    821 F.3d 265 (2d Cir. 2016)   Cited 10 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Docket No. 15–1164–cv. 04-13-2016 FLO & EDDIE, INC., a California Corporation, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. SIRIUS XM RADIO, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant–Appellant, Does, 1 through 10, Defendants. Harvey Geller (Henry Gradstein, Maryann R. Marzano, on the brief), Gradstein & Marzano, P.C., Los Angeles, CA; (Evan S. Cohen, Esq., on the brief), Los Angeles, CA; for Plaintiff–Appellee. Daniel M. Petrocelli (Cassandra L. Seto, on the brief)