9 Cited authorities

  1. Badie v. Bank of America

    67 Cal.App.4th 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 1,300 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a credit card company could not introduce an alternative dispute resolution provision through a "bill stuffer" where nothing in the original agreement mentioned dispute resolution
  2. People v. Woodell

    17 Cal.4th 448 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 382 times
    Holding that the record of conviction includes not only the trial court record but also an appellate opinion, at least for nonhearsay purposes
  3. Ray v. Alad Corp.

    19 Cal.3d 22 (Cal. 1977)   Cited 439 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding successor corporation liable for injuries caused by defectively manufactured ladder
  4. Oakdale Village Group v. Fong

    43 Cal.App.4th 539 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 175 times
    Noting that “[c]onversion is ... a strict liability tort”
  5. Jocer Enterprises, Inc. v. Price

    183 Cal.App.4th 559 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 85 times
    Holding legal disability includes absence from the state
  6. Platt v. Coldwell Banker Res. Real Estate Serv

    217 Cal.App.3d 1439 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 50 times

    Docket No. D009465. February 15, 1990. [Opinion certified for partial publication. ] Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976.1 and 976(b), this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part II B. Appeal from Superior Court of San Diego County, No. 589723, Jack R. Levitt, Judge. COUNSEL Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois Bisgaard, Patricia Mundy, Janice Gay Gibbons and Manuel R. Ramos for Cross-complainants and Appellants. Lindley, Lazar Scales, Robert M. McLeod and Ron A. Stormoen

  7. Schaeffer Land Trust v. San Jose City Council

    215 Cal.App.3d 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 50 times
    In Schaeffer Land Trust v. San Jose City Council (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 612, 619, footnote 2, this court held that " '[a] point which is merely suggested by... counsel, with no supporting argument or authority, is deemed to be without foundation and requires no discussion.' [Citation.]" (Cf.
  8. Children's Hospital v. Sedgwick

    45 Cal.App.4th 1780 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 28 times
    Concluding that equitable considerations supported preclusion of the indemnity claim pursuant to the "`no indemnity without liability'" principle
  9. Major Clients Agency v. Diemer

    67 Cal.App.4th 1116 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 23 times
    Affirming the trial court's dismissal of a complaint without leave to amend where the appellant sought leave to amend, but failed to actually offer to allege facts which would establish a cause of action