§Why CasetextPricing

Beck Chevrolet Co., Inc., Appellant,v.General Motors LLC, Respondent.

Brief

17 Cited authorities

  1. Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach

    523 U.S. 26 (1998)   Cited 844 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, because the remand requirement is absolute, the transferee court may not invoke the change-of-venue statute to assign transferred cases to itself for trial

  2. New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co.

    439 U.S. 96 (1978)   Cited 222 times
    Recognizing State interest in regulating dealer-manufacturer relationship

  3. Bloomfield v. Bloomfield

    97 N.Y.2d 188 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 150 times
    Applying section 203(d) to permit a wife's challenge to a 30-year-old prenuptial agreement propounded by her husband

  4. Rangolan v. County of Nassau

    96 N.Y.2d 42 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 99 times
    In Rangolan v. County of Nassau (96 NY2d 42), this Court held that CPLR 1602 (2) (iv) did not preclude apportionment when a defendant's liability arose from a nondelegable duty because the subsection was a savings provision and not an exception.

  5. Mtr. of OnBank Trust Co.

    90 N.Y.2d 725 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 81 times
    Finding that a portion of Banking Law § 100–c would be meaningless if applied prospectively only, given the statute's reference to EPTL § 11–2.2(b), which contains a specific date, thus warranting a retroactive application of the statute

  6. Finger Lakes v. Racing Bd.

    45 N.Y.2d 471 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 127 times
    Striking down an administrative agency's regulation for being in “direct conflict” with the statute

  7. Matter of Rodriguez v. Perales

    86 N.Y.2d 361 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 73 times
    In Rodriguez (supra), the Court of Appeals flatly rejected the Appellate Division's "policy-based concern" that strict interpretation of the relevant statutes would result in a "windfall" to the indigent individual, noting that the Social Security Act "does not evince a legislative intent to ensure a one-to-one correspondence between the amount of interim assistance paid and the amount of reimbursement covered."

  8. Beck Chevrolet Co. v. General Motors LLC

    787 F.3d 663 (2d Cir. 2015)   Cited 25 times
    Stating that factual findings after a bench trial are reviewed for clear error

  9. Action Nissan, Inc. v. Nissan North America

    454 F. Supp. 2d 108 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)   Cited 6 times

    No. 05 Civ. 3864 (WCC). September 22, 2006. Bressler, Amery Ross, PC, New York City (Eric L. Chase, Genevieve K. La Robardier, Christopher G. Massey, Jacquelyn R. Trussell, Of Counsel), for Plaintiff. Bingham McCutchen LLP, New York City (Timothy J. Stevens, Of Counsel), Bingham McCutchen LLP, Boston, MA (William N. Berkowitz, William F. Benson, Of Counsel), for Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff Action Nissan, Inc. ("Action Nissan") brings this action

  10. People v. Gowasky

    244 N.Y. 451 (N.Y. 1927)   Cited 145 times
    Reviewing the history of recidivism statutes

  11. Section 463 - Unfair business practices by franchisors

    N.Y. Veh. & Traf. Law § 463   Cited 51 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a franchisor may not "refuse to accept a return of" a terminated franchisee's inventory and must pay fair and reasonable compensation when repurchasing the inventory