48 Cited authorities

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (1966) Cited 60,311 times 64 Legal Analyses
Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment
Dickerson v. United States
530 U.S. 428 (2000) Cited 2,290 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that “the protections announced in Miranda ” are “constitutionally required”
Doyle v. Ohio
426 U.S. 610 (1976) Cited 4,437 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that the prosecution may not use a defendant's silence against him after he has received government assurances
United States v. Hasting
461 U.S. 499 (1983) Cited 1,612 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Chapman mandates harmless error analysis of Griffin error
People v. Mateo
2 N.Y.3d 383 (N.Y. 2004) Cited 3,448 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding criminal liability attaches to "a person concerned in the commission of a crime whether he directly commits the act constituting the offense or aids and abets in its commission . . ."
Harris v. New York
401 U.S. 222 (1971) Cited 2,514 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that voluntary statements obtained in violation of Miranda are admissible for impeachment on cross-examination
Tennessee v. Street
471 U.S. 409 (1985) Cited 775 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that non-hearsay admissions do not raise "Confrontation Clause concerns"
People v. Crimmins
36 N.Y.2d 230 (N.Y. 1975) Cited 5,689 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that an error is prejudicial "if an appellate court concludes that there is a significant probability, rather than only a rational possibility, in the particular case that the jury would have acquitted the defendant had it not been for the error or errors which occurred"
Oregon v. Hass
420 U.S. 714 (1975) Cited 1,012 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that statements obtained in violation of Miranda, though excluded from the prosecution's case-in-chief, may be used to impeach the defendant's testimony if otherwise voluntary
United States v. Robinson
485 U.S. 25 (1988) Cited 556 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that prosecutorial references to a defendant's silence are permissible when they are a "fair response to a claim made by defendant or his counsel"

The People, Respondent,v.Derrick Hill, Appellant.

48 Cited authorities

Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment

Holding that “the protections announced in Miranda ” are “constitutionally required”

Holding that the prosecution may not use a defendant's silence against him after he has received government assurances

Holding that Chapman mandates harmless error analysis of Griffin error

Finding criminal liability attaches to "a person concerned in the commission of a crime whether he directly commits the act constituting the offense or aids and abets in its commission . . ."

Holding that voluntary statements obtained in violation of Miranda are admissible for impeachment on cross-examination

Holding that non-hearsay admissions do not raise "Confrontation Clause concerns"

Holding that an error is prejudicial "if an appellate court concludes that there is a significant probability, rather than only a rational possibility, in the particular case that the jury would have acquitted the defendant had it not been for the error or errors which occurred"

Holding that statements obtained in violation of Miranda, though excluded from the prosecution's case-in-chief, may be used to impeach the defendant's testimony if otherwise voluntary

Holding that prosecutorial references to a defendant's silence are permissible when they are a "fair response to a claim made by defendant or his counsel"