§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Chenango Forks Central School District, Appellant,v.New York State Public Employment Relations Board et al., Respondents.

Brief

14 Cited authorities

  1. 300 Gramatan v. Human Rights

    45 N.Y.2d 176 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 2,304 times
    In 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights (45 NY2d 176), we stated that "substantial evidence consists of proof within the whole record of such quality and quantity as to generate conviction in and persuade a fair and detached fact finder that, from that proof as a premise, a conclusion or ultimate fact may be extracted reasonably — probatively and logically" (id. at 181).

  2. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 628 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  3. Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward

    70 N.Y.2d 436 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 880 times
    Holding that it is axiomatic that credibility determinations are best made by the person who actually sees and hears the witness, as the courts are "disadvantaged . . . because their review is confined to a lifeless record."

  4. People ex Rel. Vega v. Smith

    66 N.Y.2d 130 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 603 times
    In Vega, however, the misbehavior reports described with specificity an incident witnessed by the author and were endorsed or initialled by other correction officers.

  5. FMC Corp. v. Unmack

    92 N.Y.2d 179 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 231 times

    92 N.Y.2d 179 699 N.E.2d 893, 677 N.Y.S.2d 269 In the Matter of FMC CORPORATION (PEROXYGEN CHEMICALS DIVISION), Appellant, v. David UNMACK, as Assessor of Town of Tonawanda, et al., Respondents, et al., Intervenor-Respondent. In the Matter of SOUTH SLOPE HOLDING CORP. et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF the TOWN OF JERUSALEM et al., Respondents. (Appeal No. 1.) In the Matter of SOUTH SLOPE HOLDING CORP. et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF the TOWN OF JERUSALEM et

  6. Matter of Board of Education

    93 N.Y.2d 132 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 181 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Watertown, the New York Court of Appeals scrutinized two-decades of jurisprudence concerning the "presumptions relating to arbitrability in the public sector [and] the respective roles of courts and arbitrators.

  7. Matter of McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v. City

    92 N.Y.2d 326 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that retiree health benefits are not "terms and conditions of employment," finding that while "[h]ealth benefits for current employees can be a form of compensation, and thus a term of employment that is a mandatory subject of negotiation," "a public employer's statutory duty to bargain does not extend to retirees"

  8. Incorporated Village of Lynbrook v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    48 N.Y.2d 398 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 111 times
    Evaluating PERB determination

  9. Chenango Forks Cent. Sch. Dist. v. State Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.

    95 A.D.3d 1479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 21 times

    2012-05-10 In the Matter of CHENANGO FORKS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD et al., Respondents. Coughlin & Gerhart, L.L.P., Binghamton (Lars P. Mead of counsel), for petitioner. David P. Quinn, New York State Public Employment Relations Board, Albany, for New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent. PETERS Coughlin & Gerhart, L.L.P., Binghamton (Lars P. Mead of counsel), for petitioner. David P. Quinn, New York State Public

  10. Matter of Roma v. Ruffo

    92 N.Y.2d 489 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 25 times
    In Roma, the defendant school notified the plaintiff school matrons "that their daily work schedule was to be reduced from eight hours to six."