§Why CasetextPricing

Paul Davis, Appellant,v.Scottish Re Group Limited, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Brief

31 Cited authorities

  1. Edgar v. MITE Corp.

    457 U.S. 624 (1982)   Cited 769 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "matters peculiar to the relationships among or between the corporation and its current officers, directors, and shareholders" are a corporation's internal affairs

  2. Skillgames v. Brody

    1 A.D.3d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 471 times
    Upholding dismissal of related claim of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing

  3. Tanges v. Heidelberg North America, Inc.

    93 N.Y.2d 48 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 126 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding Connecticut's own classification only instructive, not binding

  4. Chateau D' If Corp. v. City of New York

    219 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)   Cited 127 times
    Holding that because "a liquidated damages clause and a provision entitling a nondefaulting vendor to further damages are incompatible and cannot coexist," the liquidated damages provision is rendered unenforceable

  5. Hart v. General Motors Corp.

    129 A.D.2d 179 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)   Cited 155 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the law of the place of incorporation governs "the threshold demand issue" of standing to sue

  6. Fraternity Fund v. Beacon Hill Asset

    376 F. Supp. 2d 385 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that an SEC complaint is an adequate source for a factual allegation

  7. City of Harper Woods v. Olver

    589 F.3d 1292 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 69 times
    Finding that a challenge to standing requiring the testimony of foreign law experts under Rule 44.1 to be a factual, not facial, challenge to jurisdiction, permitting the Court to consider any relevant evidence, in accordance with Rule 44.1

  8. Lerner v. Prince

    119 A.D.3d 122 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 45 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Stating that "[u]nder New York choice-of-law rules, matters of procedure are governed by the law of the forum"

  9. Batchelder v. Kawamoto

    147 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 58 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an ADR holder could not sue derivatively under Japanese law as only shareholders appearing on the company's shareholders' register may institute a derivative action

  10. Winn ex Rel. Scottish re Group v. Schafer

    499 F. Supp. 2d 390 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)   Cited 39 times
    Holding that under New York choice of law rules, the law of the Cayman Islands applied to a derivative claim on behalf of a Cayman corporation

  11. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation