18 Cited authorities

  1. Leon v. Martinez

    84 N.Y.2d 83 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 7,394 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the allegations in the complaint and the supporting affidavits were adequate to withstand a motion to dismiss
  2. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co.

    350 U.S. 198 (1956)   Cited 617 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the language of the FAA makes clear that Congress chose certain “kind of agreement” to be brought under federal regulation and exempted others
  3. Burke v. Crosson

    85 N.Y.2d 10 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 133 times

    Argued January 5, 1995 Decided February 9, 1995 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Rosemary S. Pooler, J. Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh, Jerry Boone and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for Edward Regan and another, appellants. Michael Colodner, New York City, John Eiseman and John J. Sullivan for Matthew T. Crosson, appellant. Julian Pertz, P.C., Utica (Robert F. Julian of counsel), for respondents. TITONE, J. Plaintiffs, three Onondaga County Court Judges, commenced

  4. Tanges v. Heidelberg North America, Inc.

    93 N.Y.2d 48 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 103 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding Connecticut's own classification only instructive, not binding
  5. Telaro v. Telaro

    25 N.Y.2d 433 (N.Y. 1969)   Cited 108 times

    Argued October 28, 1969 Decided December 4, 1969 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, FREDERICK BACKER, J. Leonard C. Shalleck, Irving I. Erdheim and Milton P. Falk for appellant. Morris H. Halpern and Abraham J. Heller for respondent. BREITEL, J. This appeal involves an action by a wife to recover, inter alia, one half of some $24,800 withdrawn by her husband, defendant-respondent, from a brokerage account held at that time in the names of both

  6. Winn ex Rel. Scottish re Group v. Schafer

    499 F. Supp. 2d 390 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that under New York choice of law rules, the law of the Cayman Islands applied to a derivative claim on behalf of a Cayman corporation
  7. Howe v. the Bank of N.Y. Mellon

    783 F. Supp. 2d 466 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)   Cited 19 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Howe, the court allowed Plaintiff-bondholder's unjust enrichment claim to stand against a co-issuer of trust preferred securities.
  8. Sachs v. Adeli

    26 A.D.3d 52 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 23 times   1 Legal Analyses

    6447. November 29, 2005. APPEAL from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered January 10, 2005. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion to compel defendants-respondents to execute authorizations to release certain corporate sales tax records. Aaron Richard Golub, P.C., New York City ( Nehemiah S. Glanc, Aaron Richard Golub and Mark W. Moody of counsel), for appellant. Ballon, Stoll, Bader Nadler, P.C., New York City ( Susan Schneiderman

  9. Shenwick v. HM Ruby Fund, L.P.

    106 A.D.3d 638 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 8 times

    2013-05-28 Linda SHENWICK, derivatively on behalf of Himelsein Mandel Offshore Limited, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. HM RUBY FUND, L.P., et al., Defendants–Respondents, Himelsein Mandel Offshore Limited, Nominal Defendant. Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky, LLP, New York (Jeffrey S. Abraham of counsel), for appellant. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, New York (William M. Regan of counsel), for HM Ruby Fund, L.P., Wayne Himelsein, Jason G. Mandel, Himelsein Mandel Advisors LLC and Himelsein Mandel Fund Management

  10. In re Tyco International, Ltd.

    340 F. Supp. 2d 94 (D.N.H. 2004)   Cited 16 times
    Noting that it has been suggested that "personal rights" maybe not be a true exception "because a shareholder's suit to protect her personal rights is not brought as a derivative action"