§Why CasetextPricing

Response Reply

undefined

13 Cited authorities

  1. Blank v. Kirwan

    39 Cal.3d 311 (Cal. 1985)   Cited 3,091 times
    Holding that the standard for a failure to state a claim is whether "the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action"

  2. Badie v. Bank of America

    67 Cal.App.4th 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 1,300 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a credit card company could not introduce an alternative dispute resolution provision through a "bill stuffer" where nothing in the original agreement mentioned dispute resolution

  3. SC Manufactured Homes, Inc. v. Liebert

    162 Cal.App.4th 68 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 109 times
    In SC Manufactured Homes, the operative fact was whether the mobile home park had prohibited the plaintiff from selling to its tenants.

  4. Spangler v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

    278 F.3d 847 (8th Cir. 2002)   Cited 129 times
    Holding that the court "cannot say, as a matter of law, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Spangler, no genuine issue of material fact with regard to appropriate notice exists"

  5. Bernard v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

    226 Cal.App.3d 1203 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 141 times
    Disapproving of the appellant's use of a "block page reference" to support factual assertions

  6. Lonicki v. Sutter Health Central

    43 Cal.4th 201 (Cal. 2008)   Cited 84 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting reasoning of Sims

  7. Rogers v. County of Los Angeles

    198 Cal.App.4th 480 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 73 times
    Explaining that the FMLA and CFRA "contain nearly identical provisions"

  8. Anastos v. Lee

    118 Cal.App.4th 1314 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 72 times
    Affirming trial court decision to deny relief under section 473.5 where affidavits failed to establish lack of notice not caused by neglect

  9. Jackson v. Kaplan Higher Educ., LLC

    106 F. Supp. 3d 1118 (E.D. Cal. 2015)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that employee failed to allege or produce evidence that would give rise to inference that adverse employment action she suffered was result of age bias where, among other things, supervisor was not decision-maker who had actual authority to terminate employee

  10. Jaffe v. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs., Inc.

    Case No. 2:17-cv-03421-ODW (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2017)   Cited 1 times

    Case No. 2:17-cv-03421-ODW (Ex) 07-24-2017 TIMOTHY JAFFE, an individual Plaintiff, v. SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation; and DOES 1-50; inclusive, Defendants OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO STRIKE [12] I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Timothy Jaffe asserts eight causes of action against his former employer, Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. ("Sedgwick"), all arising from events

  11. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,408 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems

  12. Section 12-6.001 - Application of Rules

    Fla. Admin. Code R. 12-6.001   Cited 18 times
    Stating a third cause of action for “violation of Plaintiffs' First Amendment Right because the policy is unconstitutionally vague and denies due process”

  13. Section 11090 - Computation of Time Periods: Twelve Workweeks; Minimum Duration

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 11090

    (a) CFRA leave does not need to be taken in one continuous period of time. It cannot exceed more than 12 workweeks total for any purpose in a 12-month period. (b) If the leave is common to both CFRA and FMLA, this 12-month period will run concurrently with the 12-month period under FMLA. An employer may choose any of the methods (the calendar year, any fixed 12-month "leave year," the 12-month period measured forward from the date any employee's first CFRA leave begins, or a "rolling" 12-month period