5 Cited authorities

  1. Blank v. Kirwan

    39 Cal.3d 311 (Cal. 1985)   Cited 3,024 times
    Holding that the standard for a failure to state a claim is whether "the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action"
  2. Moore v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.

    248 Cal.App.4th 216 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 142 times
    Holding that the FEHA amendment was prospective in application, and thus Moore could not base FEHA retaliation claim solely on the request for accommodation, because the amendment was not in effect at time of protected activity
  3. Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co.

    123 Cal.App.3d 593 (Cal. Ct. App. 1981)   Cited 236 times
    Holding that an entitlement to future possession is insufficient to maintain an action for conversion
  4. Pettus v. Cole

    49 Cal.App.4th 402 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 97 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a doctor's disclosure of detailed medical and psychiatric information to that plaintiff's private employer following an examination associated with a disability leave policy was not adequately justified because the "detailed psychiatric information [the employer] requested and obtained from [the doctors], and ultimately used to make adverse personnel decisions about Pettus, was far more than the employer needed to accomplish its legitimate objectives," in the context of a private employer's personnel actions involving "no dispute resolution mechanism, no hearings"
  5. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,113 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system