14 Cited authorities

Schifando v. City of Los Angeles
31 Cal.4th 1074 (Cal. 2003) Cited 1,272 times
Denying request where the materials sought to be judicially noticed were not particularly supportive of the respondent's cause or relevant to the action and noting that "[n]o party has alleged" what the amicus curiae had purported to respond to
Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist.
2 Cal.4th 962 (Cal. 1992) Cited 1,196 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Aubry, supra, 42 Cal.App.4th 579 at pages 587 through 588, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 703, the court, citing language from Labor Council, held the Regents were not required to pay private contractors the prevailing wage under section 1770 et seq., which applies to public works, for the construction of student and staff housing.
Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.
19 Cal.4th 26 (Cal. 1998) Cited 767 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that title insurer owed no duty of ordinary care to non-clients, commenting that "[i]n the business arena it would be unprecedented to impose a duty on one actor to operate its business in a manner that would ensure the financial success of transactions between third parties"
Serrano v. Priest
5 Cal.3d 584 (Cal. 1971) Cited 538 times
Holding that the structure of the education funding system in California denied students equal protection
Desny v. Wilder
46 Cal.2d 715 (Cal. 1956) Cited 251 times 4 Legal Analyses
In Desny, the California Supreme Court recognized that a writer and producer form an implied contract under circumstances where both understand that the writer is disclosing his idea on the condition that he will be compensated if it is used. 299 P.2d at 270.
Scott v. City of Indian Wells
6 Cal.3d 541 (Cal. 1972) Cited 130 times
Holding that nonresident property owners had standing to challenge a conditional-use permit issued by a neighboring city because the property owners' land was adjacent to the lot subject to the conditional-use permit
Lee v. Bank of America
27 Cal.App.4th 197 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994) Cited 48 times
Finding that pleadings filed in amended complaint were not supplemental pleadings as they were unrelated
Flood v. Simpson
45 Cal.App.3d 644 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975) Cited 48 times
In Flood, the trial court entered default judgment against a pro se litigant who willfully failed to appear for a deposition three times.
Fifth & Broadway Partnership v. Kimny, Inc.
102 Cal.App.3d 195 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980) Cited 27 times
In Fifth Broadway Partnership v. Kimny, Inc. (1980) 102 Cal.App.3d 195 [ 162 Cal.Rptr. 271, 7 A.L.R.4th 580], the motion to add a new defendant was made in mid-trial.
General Credit Corp. v. Pichel
44 Cal.App.3d 844 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975) Cited 16 times
In General Credit Corporation v. Pichel (1975) 44 Cal.App.3d 844 (General Credit), the Court of Appeal concluded that the trial court properly allowed the plaintiff to amend its pleading to conform to proof, based on the standard of "whether recovery is being sought 'on the same general set of facts'."
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 23,110 times 16 Legal Analyses
Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems

Opposition Objections

14 Cited authorities

Denying request where the materials sought to be judicially noticed were not particularly supportive of the respondent's cause or relevant to the action and noting that "[n]o party has alleged" what the amicus curiae had purported to respond to

Holding that title insurer owed no duty of ordinary care to non-clients, commenting that "[i]n the business arena it would be unprecedented to impose a duty on one actor to operate its business in a manner that would ensure the financial success of transactions between third parties"

Holding that the structure of the education funding system in California denied students equal protection

In Desny, the California Supreme Court recognized that a writer and producer form an implied contract under circumstances where both understand that the writer is disclosing his idea on the condition that he will be compensated if it is used. 299 P.2d at 270.

Holding that nonresident property owners had standing to challenge a conditional-use permit issued by a neighboring city because the property owners' land was adjacent to the lot subject to the conditional-use permit

Finding that pleadings filed in amended complaint were not supplemental pleadings as they were unrelated

In Flood, the trial court entered default judgment against a pro se litigant who willfully failed to appear for a deposition three times.

In Fifth Broadway Partnership v. Kimny, Inc. (1980) 102 Cal.App.3d 195 [ 162 Cal.Rptr. 271, 7 A.L.R.4th 580], the motion to add a new defendant was made in mid-trial.

Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems