14 Cited authorities

  1. Schifando v. City of Los Angeles

    31 Cal.4th 1074 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,269 times
    Denying request where the materials sought to be judicially noticed were not particularly supportive of the respondent's cause or relevant to the action and noting that "[n]o party has alleged" what the amicus curiae had purported to respond to
  2. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist.

    2 Cal.4th 962 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 1,191 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Aubry, supra, 42 Cal.App.4th 579 at pages 587 through 588, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 703, the court, citing language from Labor Council, held the Regents were not required to pay private contractors the prevailing wage under section 1770 et seq., which applies to public works, for the construction of student and staff housing.
  3. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.

    19 Cal.4th 26 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 762 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that title insurer owed no duty of ordinary care to non-clients, commenting that "[i]n the business arena it would be unprecedented to impose a duty on one actor to operate its business in a manner that would ensure the financial success of transactions between third parties"
  4. Serrano v. Priest

    5 Cal.3d 584 (Cal. 1971)   Cited 537 times
    Holding that the structure of the education funding system in California denied students equal protection
  5. Desny v. Wilder

    46 Cal.2d 715 (Cal. 1956)   Cited 251 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In Desny, the California Supreme Court recognized that a writer and producer form an implied contract under circumstances where both understand that the writer is disclosing his idea on the condition that he will be compensated if it is used. 299 P.2d at 270.
  6. Scott v. City of Indian Wells

    6 Cal.3d 541 (Cal. 1972)   Cited 130 times
    Holding that nonresident property owners had standing to challenge a conditional-use permit issued by a neighboring city because the property owners' land was adjacent to the lot subject to the conditional-use permit
  7. Lee v. Bank of America

    27 Cal.App.4th 197 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 48 times
    Finding that pleadings filed in amended complaint were not supplemental pleadings as they were unrelated
  8. Flood v. Simpson

    45 Cal.App.3d 644 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975)   Cited 48 times
    In Flood, the trial court entered default judgment against a pro se litigant who willfully failed to appear for a deposition three times.
  9. Fifth & Broadway Partnership v. Kimny, Inc.

    102 Cal.App.3d 195 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 26 times
    In Fifth Broadway Partnership v. Kimny, Inc. (1980) 102 Cal.App.3d 195 [ 162 Cal.Rptr. 271, 7 A.L.R.4th 580], the motion to add a new defendant was made in mid-trial.
  10. General Credit Corp. v. Pichel

    44 Cal.App.3d 844 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975)   Cited 16 times
    In General Credit Corporation v. Pichel (1975) 44 Cal.App.3d 844 (General Credit), the Court of Appeal concluded that the trial court properly allowed the plaintiff to amend its pleading to conform to proof, based on the standard of "whether recovery is being sought 'on the same general set of facts'."
  11. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system