§Why CasetextPricing

Opposition Objections

undefined

10 Cited authorities

  1. Kaufman v. Goldman

    195 Cal.App.4th 734 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 71 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding move-out provision in settlement agreement did not violate antiwaiver provision in Rent Ordinance

  2. Transit Ads, Inc. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.

    270 Cal.App.2d 275 (Cal. Ct. App. 1969)   Cited 47 times
    In Transit Ads, Inc. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. (1969) 270 Cal.App.2d 275 (Transit Ads), relied upon by Scripps, counsel, a sole practitioner, for a party seeking to set aside a default judgment declared he had taken weight loss medication that caused him to become "nauseated, dizzy, in a general weakened condition," preventing him from doing paper work or working at a desk.

  3. In re Marriage of Carter

    19 Cal.App.3d 479 (Cal. Ct. App. 1971)   Cited 39 times
    Denying relief from a stipulation

  4. Elms v. Elms

    72 Cal.App.2d 508 (Cal. Ct. App. 1946)   Cited 88 times
    In Elms, the defendant husband moved to set aside a posttrial judgment of annulment partly on the grounds of excusable neglect.

  5. Wilcox v. Ford

    206 Cal.App.3d 1170 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)   Cited 15 times
    Considering the plaintiff's duty to keep track of the case in deciding that estoppel did not apply

  6. Baratti v. Baratti

    109 Cal.App.2d 917 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952)   Cited 66 times

    Docket No. 18732. March 24, 1952. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying motion to vacate a default and an interlocutory judgment of divorce based thereon. Daniel N. Stevens, Judge. Affirmed. George A. Pickering for Appellant. Walter C. Harbert for Respondent. VALLEE, J. Appeal by defendant from an order denying her motion to vacate a default and an interlocutory decree of divorce based thereon. The complaint was filed November 16, 1950. The summons and complaint

  7. Webster v. Webster

    216 Cal. 485 (Cal. 1932)   Cited 59 times
    In Webster v. Webster, 216 Cal. 485 [ 14 P.2d 522], the plaintiff appealed only from that portion of the interlocutory decree determining the property rights of the parties.

  8. Bruskey v. Bruskey

    4 Cal.App.2d 472 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)   Cited 19 times

    Docket No. 1429. February 8, 1935. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County vacating a prior order of dismissal. James L. Allen, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Paul Nourse for Appellant. Head, Wellington Jacobs for Respondent. JENNINGS, J. The order from which this appeal is taken is an order made November 14, 1932, vacating a prior order made on July 19, 1932, dismissing the action on plaintiff's motion. The motion for vacation of the order

  9. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  10. Section 473 - Mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 473   Cited 5,940 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Allowing up to six months to challenge a judgment entered through the moving party's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect