§Why CasetextPricing

Brief Trial

undefined

12 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Riel

    22 Cal.4th 1153 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 1,013 times
    Holding juror's erroneous statement regarding potential sentence not misconduct

  2. People v. Carpenter

    15 Cal.4th 312 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 1,088 times
    Holding that a defendant could not raise an equal protection challenge for the first time on appeal

  3. People v. Cummings

    4 Cal.4th 1233 (Cal. 1993)   Cited 916 times
    Holding that in a murder trial, the lower court prejudicially admitted into evidence the separate conviction of a codefendant's wife as an accessory to murder and robbery under Evidence Code section 352

  4. People v. Duenas

    55 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding evidence was admissible because it supported inference that "defendant continued to shoot after [victim] was lying on the ground, suggesting premeditation and deliberation"

  5. People v. Ham

    7 Cal.App.3d 768 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970)   Cited 125 times

    Docket No. 7577. May 20, 1970. Appeal from Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, Gilbert B. Perry, Judge. COUNSEL Leonard Luther Nolting, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Robert R. Granucci and Gloria F. DeHart, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION MOLINARI, P.J. Defendant appeals from a denial of his motion for a new trial and from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict convicting defendant

  6. People v. Green

    47 Cal.2d 209 (Cal. 1956)   Cited 90 times
    Holding trial court had discretion to permit use of motion picture and photographs later admitted into evidence during opening statement

  7. People v. La Vergne

    64 Cal.2d 265 (Cal. 1966)   Cited 17 times

    Docket No. Crim. 9082. March 2, 1966. APPEAL, automatically taken under Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b), from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. Gerald C. Thomas, Judge. Affirmed. A. Lee Estep, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Gordon Ringer, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. PEEK, J. Defendant, and one Cecil Larry Watters, who has not been apprehended

  8. People v. Kirk

    43 Cal.App.3d 921 (Cal. Ct. App. 1974)   Cited 8 times

    Docket No. 12248. October 21, 1974. Appeal from Superior Court of Monterey County, Nos. MCR 1597, MCR 1598, Ralph M. Drummond, Judge. COUNSEL Sam L. Foster for Defendant and Appellant. Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Jack R. Winkler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Edward P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Derald E. Granberg and Clifford K. Thompson, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION ELKINGTON, J. On a jury's verdicts defendant Kirk was found guilty

  9. People v. Cossey

    97 Cal.App.2d 101 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)   Cited 14 times
    In People v. Cossey (1950) 97 Cal.App.2d 101, 114-115 [ 217 P.2d 133], dismissal of the appeal was denied where the defendant resided in Canada but was on bail and thus remained in constructive custody.

  10. Rahlves & Rahlves, Inc. v. Ambort

    118 Cal.App.2d 465 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)   Cited 5 times

    Docket No. 8176. June 12, 1953. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. C.C. McDonald, Judge. Affirmed. Royal E. Handlos for Appellants. Chalmers, Cowing Sans for Respondent. SCHOTTKY, J. This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment quieting plaintiff's title to certain real property "as delineated on and according to the map of Rahlves Addition filed of record" in the office of the county recorder of Yolo County. Appellants urge several grounds for a reversal of the judgment

  11. Section 22107 - Turning from direct course or moving left or right upon roadway

    Cal. Veh. Code § 22107   Cited 187 times
    Turning movements and required signals