23 Cited authorities

Oasis West Realty, LLC v. Goldman
51 Cal.4th 811 (Cal. 2011) Cited 1,331 times 2 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that an attorney "may not do anything which will injuriously affect former client in any matter in which [the attorney] formerly represented [the client]"
Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
198 Cal.App.4th 256 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011) Cited 607 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that, while MERS did not have “its own right to assign the note, since it had no interest in the note to assign,” it had the power to assign the note as the lender's “nominee” or “agent”
Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
192 Cal.App.4th 1149 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011) Cited 609 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a plaintiff has no right to sue to contest the foreclosing beneficiary's authority to initiate or conduct a nonjudicial foreclosure because California's framework does not permit "a court action to determine whether the owner of the Note has authorized its nominee to initiate the foreclosure process" as "recognition of the right to [do so] would fundamentally undermine the nonjudicial nature of the process
Kasky v. Nike
27 Cal.4th 939 (Cal. 2002) Cited 683 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that statements by the defendant about the working conditions of its overseas employees were not protected by the First Amendment and could give rise to a claim for fraudulent business practices under the UCL
Allen v. City of Sacramento
234 Cal.App.4th 41 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015) Cited 429 times
Holding allegation of "a wrongful arrest or detention, without more, does not" state a claim for violation of the Bane Act
Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP
221 Cal.App.4th 49 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013) Cited 412 times
Holding loan service providers do not owe a plaintiff a duty of care when considering a loan modification application
Saterbak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
245 Cal.App.4th 808 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016) Cited 296 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that an assignment of a loan into a securitized trust that was allegedly forged or untimely was merely voidable and, therefore, the borrower lacked standing to challenge its validity
C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School District
53 Cal.4th 861 (Cal. 2012) Cited 227 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding that supervisory personnel could be vicariously liable and noting that "public school personnel may be individually liable for their negligent failure to protect students from harm at others' hands"
Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc.
14 Cal.App.4th 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993) Cited 386 times
Holding that " demurrer for uncertainty is strictly construed, even where a complaint is in some respects uncertain, because ambiguities can be clarified under modern discovery procedures."
Charles v. Stebley
202 Cal.App.4th 522 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011) Cited 175 times 1 Legal Analyses
Foreclosing on the home of a "dependent" is, absent more, not a "wrongful use" of property under Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.30

Minute Order

23 Cited authorities

Recognizing that an attorney "may not do anything which will injuriously affect former client in any matter in which [the attorney] formerly represented [the client]"

Holding that, while MERS did not have “its own right to assign the note, since it had no interest in the note to assign,” it had the power to assign the note as the lender's “nominee” or “agent”

Holding that statements by the defendant about the working conditions of its overseas employees were not protected by the First Amendment and could give rise to a claim for fraudulent business practices under the UCL

Holding allegation of "a wrongful arrest or detention, without more, does not" state a claim for violation of the Bane Act

Holding loan service providers do not owe a plaintiff a duty of care when considering a loan modification application

Holding that an assignment of a loan into a securitized trust that was allegedly forged or untimely was merely voidable and, therefore, the borrower lacked standing to challenge its validity

Finding that supervisory personnel could be vicariously liable and noting that "public school personnel may be individually liable for their negligent failure to protect students from harm at others' hands"

Holding that " demurrer for uncertainty is strictly construed, even where a complaint is in some respects uncertain, because ambiguities can be clarified under modern discovery procedures."

Foreclosing on the home of a "dependent" is, absent more, not a "wrongful use" of property under Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.30