19 Cited authorities

  1. Allen v. City of Sacramento

    234 Cal.App.4th 41 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 408 times
    Holding allegation of "a wrongful arrest or detention, without more, does not" state a claim for violation of the Bane Act
  2. Miles v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

    236 Cal.App.4th 394 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 171 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Listing the elements of "a tort cause of action for wrongful foreclosure," including that the defendant "caused an illegal, fraudulent, or willfully oppressive sale"
  3. Bozzi v. Nordstrom, Inc.

    186 Cal.App.4th 755 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 169 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bozzi, it was error for an expert to testify that a design or maintenance defect caused an elevator to stop abruptly during a power outage.
  4. Sciarratta v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

    247 Cal.App.4th 552 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 133 times
    Rejecting the argument that a " '[c]orrective [a]ssignment' " recorded one month after the foreclosure sale "has any relevant legal effect on the nonjudicial foreclosure occurring one month prior"
  5. Thompson v. Ioane

    11 Cal.App.5th 1180 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 109 times
    Holding that absent an interest in the property, a party could not allege the "reasonable apprehension" required for a cancellation of written instruments claim
  6. Batt v. City & County of San Francisco

    155 Cal.App.4th 65 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 123 times
    Holding that accounting "is not an independent cause of action but merely a type of remedy, an equitable remedy at that"
  7. Ludgate Insurance Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    82 Cal.App.4th 592 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 112 times
    Finding that where “the bond requirement of section 1616 does not...apply, section 1620, subdivision (b), nonetheless gives the trial court discretion to require the nonadmitted alien insurer to put up such a bond”
  8. Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran

    179 Cal.App.4th 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 80 times
    Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"
  9. McWilliams v. City of Long Beach

    56 Cal.4th 613 (Cal. 2013)   Cited 72 times
    In Long, for example, the court found that the defendant had solicited business in California (the forum state) not only because he called the plaintiff in California and entered into an oral agreement whereby the plaintiff would recruit players for the defendant but also because the defendant entered into that agreement in order to develop a “presence” in California.
  10. Lee v. Silveira

    6 Cal.App.5th 527 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 43 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing trial court's denial of special motion to strike plaintiffs' declaratory relief claim