Listing the elements of "a tort cause of action for wrongful foreclosure," including that the defendant "caused an illegal, fraudulent, or willfully oppressive sale"
247 Cal.App.4th 552 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016) Cited 133 times
Rejecting the argument that a " '[c]orrective [a]ssignment' " recorded one month after the foreclosure sale "has any relevant legal effect on the nonjudicial foreclosure occurring one month prior"
11 Cal.App.5th 1180 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017) Cited 109 times
Holding that absent an interest in the property, a party could not allege the "reasonable apprehension" required for a cancellation of written instruments claim
82 Cal.App.4th 592 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000) Cited 112 times
Finding that where “the bond requirement of section 1616 does not...apply, section 1620, subdivision (b), nonetheless gives the trial court discretion to require the nonadmitted alien insurer to put up such a bond”
179 Cal.App.4th 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009) Cited 80 times
Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"
In Long, for example, the court found that the defendant had solicited business in California (the forum state) not only because he called the plaintiff in California and entered into an oral agreement whereby the plaintiff would recruit players for the defendant but also because the defendant entered into that agreement in order to develop a “presence” in California.