§Why CasetextPricing

Minute Order

undefined

16 Cited authorities

  1. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp.

    148 Cal.App.4th 97 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 362 times
    Holding a net operating loss as intangible property

  2. Richards v. CH2M Hill, Inc.

    26 Cal.4th 798 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 403 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of FEHA claims, "[i]f the employer has made clear in word and deed that the employee's attempted further reasonable accommodation is futile, then the employee is on notice that litigation, not informal conciliation, is the only alternative for the vindication of his or her rights"

  3. Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior Court

    134 Cal.App.4th 365 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 204 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs could not pursue civil penalties for a Section 558 violation without complying with the pre-filing notice and exhaustion requirements of PAGA

  4. Casterson v. Superior Court

    101 Cal.App.4th 177 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 102 times
    In Casterson, the plaintiff asserted section 35330's immunity should not be construed to protect a district's employee for injuries caused by the employee's negligence during the field trip because subdivision (d) did not expressly cover employees, while other provisions of the Education Code limiting liability for personal injuries did expressly cover employees.

  5. Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran

    179 Cal.App.4th 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 80 times
    Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"

  6. Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co.

    28 Cal.App.5th 824 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018)   Cited 53 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the legislative intent behind PAGA foreclosed the availability of equitable tolling

  7. George v. Auto. Club of South. California

    201 Cal.App.4th 1112 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 47 times
    Applying rule, but finding no ambiguity

  8. Soldinger v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

    51 Cal.App.4th 345 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 72 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that an employer's termination of a Jewish employee for observance of Passover was potentially outrageous because of evidence that the employer did not punish similar behavior by Christians

  9. Medix Ambulance Service v. Orange County

    97 Cal.App.4th 109 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 60 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff cannot state FEHA claim against person not named in administrative claim; citing California cases

  10. Alexander v. Cmty. Hosp. of Long Beach

    46 Cal.App.5th 238 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020)   Cited 27 times
    In Alexander, the plaintiffs alleged that if the employer defendant had conducted a thorough background check, the employer would have discovered the employee had a history of sexual harassment at prior jobs.

  11. Section 11050 - Order Regulating Wages, Hours, and Working Conditions in the Public Housekeeping Industry

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8 § 11050   Cited 140 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Codifying IWC Order No. 5-2001