§Why CasetextPricing

Request Judicial Notice

undefined

8 Cited authorities

  1. California Teachers Assn. v. San Diego Community College Dist.

    28 Cal.3d 692 (Cal. 1981)   Cited 476 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In California Teachers Assn. v. San Diego Community College Dist. (1981) 28 Cal.3d 692, our Supreme Court construed identical language in section 45025's predecessor, former section 13503.1.

  2. Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger Harrison

    67 Cal.App.4th 1509 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 141 times

    D025143; D026136 (Super. Ct. No. 680246) Filed November 25, 1998 Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court of San Diego County, J. Richard Haden, Judge. Casey, Gerry, Reed Schenk and T. Michael Reed for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Post Kirby Noonan Sweat, David J. Noonan and Charles T. Hoge for Defendant and Respondent Brobeck, Phleger Harrison. Donald P. Tremblay and Jonathan R. Flora for Defendant and Respondent David C. Boatwright. Haight, Brown Bonesteel, Roy G. Weatherup, Jay T. Thompson and

  3. BGJ Associates, LLC v. Superior Court

    75 Cal.App.4th 952 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 116 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that “an action for money only, even if it relates in some way to specific real property, will not support a lis pendens”

  4. Lewis v. Superior Court

    30 Cal.App.4th 1850 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 90 times
    Stating plaintiff with equitable title only has no standing to bring quiet title action

  5. Bach v. McNelis

    207 Cal.App.3d 852 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 80 times
    Noting that "lthough a court is authorized to take judicial notice in connection with a demurrer, it may not judicially notice the truth of assertions in declarations or affidavits filed in court proceedings" and clarifying that the same applied to a motion for judgment on the pleadings, because " motion on judgment on the pleadings 'is made on the same grounds, and is decided on the same basis, as a general demurrer' "

  6. Hunting World, Inc. v. Superior Court

    22 Cal.App.4th 67 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that lis pendens may be based on a CUFTA action

  7. Executive Landscape Corp. v. San Vicente Country Villas IV Assn.

    145 Cal.App.3d 496 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 30 times
    Reversing grant of demurrer where “the contract can reasonably be interpreted to require Executive to perform work for which no license was required”

  8. Deane v. Superior Court

    164 Cal.App.3d 292 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 12 times
    Distinguishing Coppinger