§Why CasetextPricing

Declaration

undefined

5 Cited authorities

  1. Weddington Productions, Inc. v. Flick

    60 Cal.App.4th 793 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 505 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agreement "must not only contain all the material terms but also express each in a reasonably definite manner."

  2. Harris v. Rudin, Richman Appel

    74 Cal.App.4th 299 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 150 times
    Holding that if a claim is based upon an "alleged breach of a written contract, the terms must be set out verbatim in the body of the complaint or a copy of the written agreement must be attached and incorporated by reference"

  3. Sully-Miller v. Gledson

    103 Cal.App.4th 30 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 72 times
    Finding that the promises to settle "were revocable until accepted by the tender of payment"

  4. Kohn v. Jaymar-Ruby, Inc.

    23 Cal.App.4th 1530 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 61 times
    Finding substantial evidence of settlement where minutes of settlement conference stated that settlement was reached; letter sent day after settlement conference confirmed terms of settlement and appellant did not object that the terms were inaccurate; and judge who presided over settlement conference confirmed that a settlement was reached

  5. Kilpatrick v. Beebe

    219 Cal.App.3d 1527 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 21 times
    In Kilpatrick, the trial court enforced an oral, out-of-court settlement agreement pursuant to a motion for summary judgment, the approved procedure for enforcing a settlement agreement prior to the enactment of Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 664.6. The appellants contended that Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 664.6 eliminated the availability of this procedure and that the procedure set forth in § 664.6 was the exclusive means for obtaining a stipulated judgment.