§Why CasetextPricing

Response Reply

undefined

16 Cited authorities

  1. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.

    222 Cal.App.3d 1371 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 949 times
    Holding that a claim for breach of the implied covenant may be disregarded if it rests on the same set of facts as a claim for breach of contract

  2. Weddington Productions, Inc. v. Flick

    60 Cal.App.4th 793 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 507 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agreement "must not only contain all the material terms but also express each in a reasonably definite manner."

  3. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.

    171 Cal.App.4th 1305 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 344 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that payment of extra money as a result of the defendant's action was sufficient for standing

  4. Peterson v. Cellco Partnership

    164 Cal.App.4th 1583 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 326 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who challenged sales commissions on insurance policies but did not allege that "they could have bought the same insurance for a lower price either directly from the insurer or from a licensed agent" could not "show they suffered actual economic injury"

  5. Alexander v. Codemasters Group Limited

    104 Cal.App.4th 129 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 251 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the views expressed in Sambrano and Laird

  6. Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.

    169 Cal.App.4th 116 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 148 times
    Holding that express warranty which lacked duration defined in units of time did not fall under § 2725 exception

  7. Scott v. Metabolife Internat., Inc.

    115 Cal.App.4th 404 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 151 times
    Affirming denial of anti-SLAPP motion where the gravamen of the plaintiff's complaint was that the defendant produced a product that did not meet its warrantied or represented characteristics, and the defendant's advertising was merely evidence of and incidental to the manufacturing and sales conduct forming the basis of the complaint

  8. Ersa Grae Corp. v. Fluor Corp.

    1 Cal.App.4th 613 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 117 times
    Affirming jury's finding that parties had enforceable contract

  9. Fieldstone Co. v. Briggs Plumbing Products, Inc.

    54 Cal.App.4th 357 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 78 times
    Finding that a general contractor could not be awarded the cost of replacing installed sinks that rusted and chipped prematurely, because no other property had been damaged

  10. Cal. Lettuce Growers v. Union Sugar Co.

    45 Cal.2d 474 (Cal. 1955)   Cited 224 times
    In California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co., 45 Cal.2d 474, 289 P.2d 785, 791 (1955), the California Supreme Court held that "where a contract confers on one party a discretionary power affecting the rights of the other, a duty is imposed to exercise that discretion in good faith and in accordance with fair dealing."