§Why CasetextPricing

Request Judicial Notice

undefined

5 Cited authorities

  1. Kaiser Foundation Hosps. v. Wilson

    201 Cal.App.4th 550 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 39 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Wilson (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 550 (Kaiser), we held that hearsay evidence is admissible at a hearing on a workplace violence restraining order (WVRO).

  2. City of Merced v. American Motorists Ins. Co.

    126 Cal.App.4th 1316 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 44 times
    Noting a party cannot raise new facts or claims for the first time in a reply brief

  3. Flores v. Arroyo

    56 Cal.2d 492 (Cal. 1961)   Cited 114 times
    In Flores, the defendant's judgment of divorce from Flores, quieting her title to the property as against Flores, could not have preclusive effect on the plaintiff's claims against the defendant because the plaintiff was not a party to the action, or in privity with a party thereto, and she had no opportunity to address the issues raised therein.

  4. Morson v. Superior Court of San Diego County

    90 Cal.App.4th 775 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Declining to give a jury instruction under the consumer expectations test "because the allergenicity of [natural rubber latex] gloves" is beyond the common experience of ordinary users

  5. Verreos v. City and County of San Francisco

    63 Cal.App.3d 86 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976)   Cited 22 times
    In Verreos v. City and County of San Francisco (1976) 63 Cal.App.3d 86 [ 133 Cal.Rptr. 649], Mayor Alioto's actions were attacked on the grounds that (1) section 3.100 of the charter was unconstitutional because violative of the due process clause; (2) no public emergency existed when the mayor issued his proclamation declaring the state of emergency; and (3) the mayor acted fraudulently and in bad faith when he issued the emergency proclamation and granted the police and firemen the salary raises they had demanded.