§Why CasetextPricing

Notice of Removal of Action

undefined

17 Cited authorities

  1. Hertz Corp. v. Friend

    559 U.S. 77 (2010)   Cited 4,213 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a corporation's principal place of business is “the place where a corporation's officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities”

  2. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Glob. Grp., L.P.

    541 U.S. 567 (2004)   Cited 2,122 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party's post-filing change in citizenship cannot cure a lack of diversity jurisdiction from the lawsuit's outset

  3. Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co.

    265 F.3d 853 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 1,421 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that remand for defective diversity allegations was unreviewable even though the removing defendant "could potentially have cured its defective allegations regarding citizenship by amending its notice of removal"

  4. Galt G/S v. JSS Scandinavia

    142 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 471 times
    Holding that attorney's fees can be counted toward the amount in controversy requirement when a statute allows such fees

  5. Chavez v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    888 F.3d 413 (9th Cir. 2018)   Cited 256 times
    Holding the plaintiff's CFRA retaliation claim "fail[ed] because she cannot show that [defendant's] reason for terminating her was pretextual"

  6. Kantor v. Wellesley Galleries, Ltd.

    704 F.2d 1088 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 301 times
    Holding state law inapplicable to the question of an individual's citizenship for diversity-jurisdiction purposes

  7. Simmons v. PCR Technology

    209 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (N.D. Cal. 2002)   Cited 167 times
    Finding that although the case cited was “not perfectly analogous” because on plaintiff suffered persistent discrimination over a ten-year period whereas the other worked at their place of employment for only four months, it did evidence “that emotional distress damages in a successful employment discrimination case may be substantial”

  8. Brady v. Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc.

    243 F. Supp. 2d 1004 (N.D. Cal. 2002)   Cited 157 times
    Holding that Song-Beverly Act's civil penalties should be included in the amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction

  9. Anthony v. Security Pacific Financial Services

    75 F.3d 311 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 154 times
    Holding that punitive damages would not satisfy the amount in controversy where the complaint failed to allege "aggravated or egregious" conduct such as to warrant punitive damages under Illinois law

  10. Richmond v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    897 F. Supp. 447 (S.D. Cal. 1995)   Cited 98 times
    Addressing amount-in-controversy under 28 U.S.C. § 1332

  11. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 111,308 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"

  12. Section 1441 - Removal of civil actions

    28 U.S.C. § 1441   Cited 50,005 times   149 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[a]ny civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising under the ... laws of the United States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties.”

  13. Section 1446 - Procedure for removal of civil actions

    28 U.S.C. § 1446   Cited 21,749 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Granting a defendant 30 days to remove after receipt of the first pleading that sets forth a removable claim

  14. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,833 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices