No. 82 SSM 2. Decided March 27, 2007. CROSS APPEALS, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered July 11, 2006, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The Appellate Division granted a petition, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Parks, Recreation, and Conservation, which had adopted the Hearing
No. 52 No. 51 05-06-2014 In the Matter of Richard Santer, Respondent, v. Board of Education of East Meadow Union Free School District, Appellant. ? In the Matter of Barbara Lucia, Respondent, v. Board of Education of East Meadow Union Free School District, Appellant. Case No. 51: George B. Pauta, for appellant. Sherry B. Bokser, for respondent. Case No. 52: George B. Pauta, for appellant. Sherry B. Bokser, for respondent. New York State School Boards Association, amicus curiae. ABDUS-SALAAM Case
Nos. 93 SSM 5, 94 SSM 6. Decided April 6, 2004. Appeal, in the first above-entitled proceeding, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, entered November 21, 2003, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Monroe County). The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and, as modified, confirmed a determination
SSM1902 Decided January 8, 2002 Appeal, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, entered March 21, 2001, which modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered in Erie County in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissing a petition seeking review of respondent School District's determination terminating petitioner from employment as
A person is guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree when he knowingly and unlawfully sells: 1. a narcotic drug; or 2. a stimulant, hallucinogen, hallucinogenic substance, or lysergic acid diethylamide and has previously been convicted of an offense defined in article two hundred twenty or the attempt or conspiracy to commit any such offense; or 3. a stimulant and the stimulant weighs one gram or more; or 4. lysergic acid diethylamide and the lysergic acid diethylamide